Suppr超能文献

内镜切除无功能垂体腺瘤后手术效果改善的证据。

Evidence of improved surgical outcome following endoscopy for nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma removal.

机构信息

Département de Neurochirurgie A, Hôpital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer, Groupement Hospitalier Est, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Bron, France.

出版信息

Neurosurg Focus. 2011 Apr;30(4):E11. doi: 10.3171/2011.1.FOCUS10308.

Abstract

OBJECT

Because of their size and lateral extension, total removal of nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs) remains a challenge and postoperative tumor remnants are frequent. Endoscopy has improved the surgeon's view; however, its superiority in terms of surgical outcome remains undetermined. The authors' aim in this study was to compare the clinical results and morbidity between microscopic and endoscopic techniques in 164 patients with NFPAs.

METHODS

Tumoral (3D MR imaging), endocrinological, and ophthalmological results and morbidity were compared between 2 groups of 82 patients with newly diagnosed NFPAs surgically treated via either a sublabial microscopic approach (Group B) or a fully endonasal endoscopic technique (Group A).

RESULTS

The groups showed no difference in terms of clinical features, tumor size, or cavernous sinus invasion (p > 0.05). One year postoperatively, the quality of resection was significantly improved in Group A (gross-total removal [GTR]: 74% vs 50% in Group B, p = 0.002) with greater control of lateral extension (Knosp Grade 2: GTR 88.2% vs 47.8% in Group B, p = 0.02; Knosp Grade 3: 67.9% vs 16.7% in Group B, p < 0.001) and suprasellar extension (tumor height 20-30 mm: GTR 76% vs 53% in Group B, p = 0.01). Endocrinological outcome in patients with a partial deficiency in anterior pituitary function preoperatively was significantly better in Group A (improvement 56% vs 25% in Group B, stabilization 22% vs 46%, and aggravation 22% vs 29%; p = 0.01). Among the ophthalmologically symptomatic patients, 100% from Group A improved compared with 93% in Group B (p = 0.35). Lastly, no significant difference was found regarding morbidity. These data were supported by the literature in which the GTR rate is consistently higher for endoscopy compared with microscopy.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large series of patients with NFPAs, endoscopy improved the quality of resection and endocrinological outcome. Larger studies focusing on the impact of these promising results on the long-term recurrence of NFPAs are warranted.

摘要

目的

由于其体积和横向延伸,非功能性垂体腺瘤(NFPAs)的完全切除仍然是一个挑战,术后肿瘤残留很常见。内窥镜检查改善了外科医生的视野;然而,其在手术结果方面的优越性仍未确定。作者旨在比较 164 例 NFPAs 患者中显微镜和内窥镜技术的临床结果和发病率。

方法

比较了经口显微镜入路(B 组)和经鼻内镜技术(A 组)治疗的 82 例新诊断 NFPAs 患者的肿瘤(3D-MRI 成像)、内分泌和眼科结果及发病率。

结果

两组在临床特征、肿瘤大小或海绵窦侵犯方面无差异(p>0.05)。术后 1 年,A 组切除质量明显改善(大体全切除[GTR]:74%比 B 组 50%,p=0.002),侧向延伸控制更好(Knosp 分级 2:GTR 88.2%比 B 组 47.8%,p=0.02;Knosp 分级 3:GTR 67.9%比 B 组 16.7%,p<0.001)和鞍上延伸(肿瘤高度 20-30mm:GTR 76%比 B 组 53%,p=0.01)。术前有部分垂体前叶功能不全的患者内分泌学结果在 A 组明显更好(改善 56%比 B 组 25%,稳定 22%比 B 组 46%,恶化 22%比 B 组 29%;p=0.01)。在眼科有症状的患者中,A 组 100%患者改善,而 B 组为 93%(p=0.35)。最后,两组之间的发病率没有显著差异。这些数据得到了文献的支持,文献中内镜检查的 GTR 率明显高于显微镜检查。

结论

在本系列大型 NFPAs 患者中,内窥镜检查提高了切除质量和内分泌学结果。需要更大规模的研究来关注这些有希望的结果对 NFPAs 长期复发的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验