Department of Large Animal Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Groennegaardsvej 8, DK - 1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Prev Vet Med. 2011 Jul 1;100(3-4):155-62. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2011.02.014. Epub 2011 Mar 31.
Specialised veal producers that purchase and raise calves from several dairy herds are potentially at high risk of delivering Salmonella-infected animals to slaughter. However, the true prevalence of Salmonella infected veal producing herds and the prevalence of infected calves delivered to slaughter from infected herds are unknown in Denmark. Due to uncertainties about test sensitivity and specificity, these prevalences are not straightforward to assess. The objective of this study was to estimate the within-herd- and between-herd prevalence of Salmonella in veal calves delivered for slaughter to abattoirs in Denmark. Furthermore, it was investigated to which extent the estimates differed between a setup using both serological tests and faecal culture, compared to just serological tests, and whether the applied sampling scheme in the national surveillance programme in Denmark was sufficient to establish high posterior estimates of freedom from infection in individual herds. We used Bayesian analysis to avoid bias as a result of fixed test validity estimates. Serological test results from 753 animals and faecal culture from 1233 animals from 68 randomly selected Danish veal producing herds that delivered more than 100 calves to slaughter per year were used to estimate the prevalences and estimates of freedom from Salmonella. Serological test results of 7726 animals from 185 herds were used to compare the difference in prevalence estimates between serology alone vs. faecal culture combined with serology. We estimated that 34-57% of specialised veal producing herds were infected with Salmonella. Within the infected herds, 21-49% of the animals were infected. Few herds obtained high posterior estimates for the probability of freedom from infection given the collected data, with only six of 68 herds obtaining posterior probability of being infected less than 10%. Furthermore, this study indicated that serology is sufficiently sensitive and specific to be used for estimating the prevalence of Salmonella-infected specialised veal producing herds.
专门饲养小牛的农场主从多个奶牛场购买和饲养小牛,他们将感染沙门氏菌的动物送到屠宰场的风险很高。然而,丹麦尚未了解感染沙门氏菌的小牛肉生产农场的真实流行率,也不了解从感染农场送来屠宰的感染小牛的流行率。由于测试敏感性和特异性存在不确定性,因此这些流行率不容易评估。本研究的目的是估计丹麦屠宰场屠宰的小牛肉犊在群内和群间感染沙门氏菌的流行率。此外,还研究了在丹麦国家监测计划中使用血清学检测和粪便培养的方法与仅使用血清学检测相比,其估计值有何不同,以及丹麦国家监测计划中应用的抽样方案是否足以建立个体农场免受感染的高后验估计值。我们使用贝叶斯分析来避免由于固定测试有效性估计而导致的偏差。使用来自 68 个随机选择的丹麦小牛肉生产农场的 753 只动物的血清学检测结果和 1233 只动物的粪便培养结果,这些农场每年向屠宰场输送 100 多只小牛,以估计流行率和小牛肉免受沙门氏菌感染的估计值。使用来自 185 个农场的 7726 只动物的血清学检测结果来比较单独使用血清学检测与粪便培养与血清学联合使用的流行率估计值之间的差异。我们估计,34-57%的专门饲养小牛肉的农场感染了沙门氏菌。在感染的农场中,21-49%的动物感染了沙门氏菌。很少有农场获得了基于收集数据的感染概率的高后验估计值,只有 68 个农场中的 6 个农场获得的感染后验概率小于 10%。此外,本研究表明,血清学检测具有足够的敏感性和特异性,可用于估计感染沙门氏菌的专门小牛肉生产农场的流行率。