Lolas F
Universidad de Chile, Facultad de Medicina, Unidad de Psicofisiología, Santiago.
Bol Oficina Sanit Panam. 1990 Jul;109(1):38-45.
Theoretical tensions and difficulties in the implementation of the biopsychosocial approach in health care uncover a problematic relationship between biomedicine and the behavioral sciences. The different professionals involved (e.g., psychologists and physicians) can interact through competition, collaboration, and integration and may be considered to represent health care subsystems, defined by profiles of their access to primary and secondary resources. Traditional institutionalization assigns the physician the hegemony in the system. Current challenges to this view underscore the need for a conceptual reformulation which should not only integrate--in a dialectical and complementary way--the contribution of physicians and other professionals, but also explicitly incorporate ethical and epistemological aspects derived from their relationship. Along with indications about the roles of metatheory, its relevance in the Latin American context is indicated.
在医疗保健中实施生物心理社会方法存在理论上的紧张关系和困难,这揭示了生物医学与行为科学之间存在问题的关系。不同的相关专业人员(如心理学家和医生)可以通过竞争、合作和整合进行互动,并且可以被视为代表医疗保健子系统,这些子系统由其获取主要和次要资源的情况来定义。传统的制度化赋予医生在系统中的霸权地位。当前对这一观点的挑战凸显了进行概念重新表述的必要性,这种重新表述不仅应以辩证和互补的方式整合医生和其他专业人员的贡献,还应明确纳入源于他们关系的伦理和认识论方面。同时也指出了元理论的作用,及其在拉丁美洲背景下的相关性。