• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加拿大急性病和长期护理机构中与艰难梭菌感染相关的感染预防和控制措施。

Infection prevention and control practices related to Clostridium difficile infection in Canadian acute and long-term care institutions.

机构信息

Canadian Field Epidemiology Program, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Am J Infect Control. 2011 Apr;39(3):177-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2011.01.007.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajic.2011.01.007
PMID:21458680
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clostridium difficile is an important pathogen in Canadian health care facilities, and infection prevention and control (IPC) practices are crucial to reducing C difficile infections (CDIs). We performed a cross-sectional study to identify CDI-related IPC practices in Canadian health care facilities.

METHODS

A survey assessing facility characteristics, CDI testing strategies, CDI contact precautions, and antimicrobial stewardship programs was sent to Canadian health care facilities in February 2005.

RESULTS

Responses were received from 943 (33%) facilities. Acute care facilities were more likely than long-term care (P < .001) and mixed care facilities (P = .03) to submit liquid stools from all patients for CDI testing. Physician orders were required before testing for CDI in 394 long-term care facilities (66%)-significantly higher than the proportions in acute care (41%; P < .001) and mixed care sites (49%; P < .001). A total of 841 sites (93%) had an infection control manual, 639 (76%) of which contained CDI-specific guidelines. Antimicrobial stewardship programs were reported by 40 (29%) acute care facilities; 19 (54%) of these sites reported full enforcement of the program.

CONCLUSION

Canadian health care facilities have widely varying C difficile IPC practices. Opportunities exist for facilities to take a more active role in IPC policy development and implementation, as well as antimicrobial stewardship.

摘要

背景

艰难梭菌是加拿大医疗机构中的重要病原体,感染预防和控制(IPC)措施对于减少艰难梭菌感染(CDI)至关重要。我们进行了一项横断面研究,以确定加拿大医疗机构中与 CDI 相关的 IPC 实践。

方法

2005 年 2 月,我们向加拿大医疗机构发送了一份评估设施特征、CDI 检测策略、CDI 接触预防和抗菌药物管理计划的调查。

结果

收到了 943 个(33%)设施的回复。与长期护理(P <.001)和混合护理设施(P =.03)相比,急性护理设施更有可能对所有患者的粪便进行 CDI 检测。在 394 家长期护理机构(66%)中,需要医生下医嘱才能进行 CDI 检测,这一比例显著高于急性护理机构(41%;P <.001)和混合护理机构(49%;P <.001)。841 个(93%)地点有感染控制手册,其中 639 个(76%)手册包含 CDI 特定指南。有 40 个(29%)急性护理机构报告了抗菌药物管理计划;其中 19 个(54%)的机构报告了该计划的全面执行情况。

结论

加拿大医疗机构的艰难梭菌 IPC 实践存在广泛差异。医疗机构在制定和实施 IPC 政策以及抗菌药物管理方面有机会发挥更积极的作用。

相似文献

1
Infection prevention and control practices related to Clostridium difficile infection in Canadian acute and long-term care institutions.加拿大急性病和长期护理机构中与艰难梭菌感染相关的感染预防和控制措施。
Am J Infect Control. 2011 Apr;39(3):177-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2011.01.007.
2
[Re-emergent etiologies: Clostridium difficile].[再次出现的病因:艰难梭菌]
Bacteriol Virusol Parazitol Epidemiol. 2007 Jul-Dec;52(3-4):181-8.
3
Clostridium difficile infection ward rounds.艰难梭菌感染病房查房。
J Hosp Infect. 2012 Jan;80(1):96-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2011.09.011. Epub 2011 Nov 17.
4
Detection, treatment, and prevention of Clostridium difficile infection.艰难梭菌感染的检测、治疗和预防。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Jun;10(6):581-92. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2012.03.008. Epub 2012 Mar 17.
5
Curtailing the spread of disease.遏制疾病传播。
Adv Nurse Pract. 2006 Jun;14(6):63-6.
6
Impact of an intervention to control Clostridium difficile infection on hospital- and community-onset disease; an interrupted time series analysis.控制艰难梭菌感染干预措施对医院和社区发病的影响:一项中断时间序列分析。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2010 Aug;16(8):1297-302. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.03077.x. Epub 2009 Oct 14.
7
Identification, optimal management, and infection control measures for Clostridium difficile-associated disease in long-term care.长期护理机构中艰难梭菌相关疾病的识别、最佳管理及感染控制措施
Geriatr Nurs. 2007 May-Jun;28(3):171-81; quiz 182. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2007.02.003.
8
[Insidious and widespread outbreak of Clostridium difficile. Changed cleaning procedures and frequent evaluations cut infection rates in half].[艰难梭菌的隐匿性广泛爆发。改变清洁程序并频繁评估可将感染率减半]
Lakartidningen. 2014;111(1-2):24-7.
9
Strategies for prevention of Clostridium difficile infection.艰难梭菌感染的预防策略。
J Hosp Med. 2012 Mar;7 Suppl 3:S14-7. doi: 10.1002/jhm.1908.
10
Clostridium difficile: a reemerging pathogen.艰难梭菌:一种再度出现的病原体。
Geriatrics. 2008 Sep 1;63(9):10-21.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient Experiences with Infection: Results of a Canada-Wide Survey.患者的感染经历:一项加拿大全国性调查的结果。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020 Jan 6;14:33-43. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S229539. eCollection 2020.
2
Quantifying Transmission of Clostridium difficile within and outside Healthcare Settings.艰难梭菌在医疗环境内外传播的量化研究
Emerg Infect Dis. 2016 Apr;22(4):608-16. doi: 10.3201/eid2204.150455.
3
Survey of -Specific Infection Control Policies in Local Long-Term Care Facilities.当地长期护理机构特定感染控制政策调查。
Int J Clin Med. 2014 Apr 1;5(7):414-419. doi: 10.4236/ijcm.2014.57056.