Department of Psychology, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Conscious Cogn. 2011 Dec;20(4):1265-71. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2011.03.007. Epub 2011 Apr 2.
According to the spreading hypothesis of object-based attention, a subliminal cue that can successfully capture attention to a location within an object should also cause attention to spread throughout the whole cued object and lead to the same-object advantage. Instead, we propose that a subliminal cue favors shifts of attention between objects and strengthens the between-object link, which is coded primarily within the dorsal pathway that governs the visual guidance of action. By adopting the two-rectangle method and using an effective subliminal cue to compare with the classic suprathreshold cue, we found a different result pattern with suprathreshold cues than with subliminal cues. The suprathreshold cue replicated the conventional location and object effects, whereas a subliminal cue led to a different-object advantage with a facilitatory location effect and a same-object advantage with an inhibitory location effect. These results support our consciousness-dependent shifting hypothesis but not the spreading hypothesis.
根据基于对象的注意扩散假说,一个能够成功将注意力吸引到对象内某个位置的潜意识提示,也应该会导致注意力在整个被提示的对象中扩散,并产生同对象优势。相反,我们提出,潜意识提示有利于在对象之间转移注意力,并加强对象之间的联系,而这种联系主要是在负责视觉引导动作的背侧通路中编码的。通过采用双矩形方法,并使用有效的潜意识提示与经典的超阈值提示进行比较,我们发现与超阈值提示相比,潜意识提示产生了不同的结果模式。超阈值提示复制了传统的位置和对象效应,而潜意识提示则导致了不同对象的优势,具有促进的位置效应和相同对象的优势,具有抑制的位置效应。这些结果支持我们的意识依赖于转移假说,而不是扩散假说。