• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

触觉信息的内隐加工:来自触觉变化觉察范式的证据。

Implicit processing of tactile information: evidence from the tactile change detection paradigm.

机构信息

Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Conscious Cogn. 2011 Sep;20(3):534-46. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2011.02.006. Epub 2011 Apr 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.concog.2011.02.006
PMID:21459622
Abstract

People can maintain accurate representations of visual changes without necessarily being aware of them. Here, we investigate whether a similar phenomenon (implicit change detection) also exists in touch. In Experiments 1 and 2, participants detected the presence of a change between two consecutively-presented tactile displays. Tactile change blindness was observed, with participants failing to report the presence of tactile change. Critically, however, when participants had to make a forced choice response regarding the number of stimuli presented in the two displays, their performance was significantly better than chance (i.e., implicit change detection was observed). Experiment 3 demonstrated that tactile change detection does not necessarily involve a shift of spatial attention toward the location of change, regardless of whether the change is explicitly detected. We conclude that tactile change detection likely results from comparing representations of the two displays, rather than by directing spatial attention to the location of the change.

摘要

人们可以在没有意识到的情况下,保持对视觉变化的准确表示。在这里,我们研究了这种类似的现象(隐性变化检测)是否也存在于触觉中。在实验 1 和 2 中,参与者检测了两个连续呈现的触觉显示之间是否存在变化。触觉变化盲被观察到,参与者未能报告触觉变化的存在。然而,至关重要的是,当参与者必须对两个显示中呈现的刺激数量进行强制选择反应时,他们的表现明显优于随机水平(即,观察到隐性变化检测)。实验 3 表明,无论是否明确检测到变化,触觉变化检测不一定涉及将空间注意转移到变化位置。我们得出结论,触觉变化检测可能是通过比较两个显示的表示来实现的,而不是将空间注意引导到变化的位置。

相似文献

1
Implicit processing of tactile information: evidence from the tactile change detection paradigm.触觉信息的内隐加工:来自触觉变化觉察范式的证据。
Conscious Cogn. 2011 Sep;20(3):534-46. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2011.02.006. Epub 2011 Apr 2.
2
Lost in the move? Secondary task performance impairs tactile change detection on the body.在转移注意力时迷失了?次要任务表现会损害对身体触觉变化的察觉。
Conscious Cogn. 2010 Mar;19(1):215-29. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2009.07.003. Epub 2009 Jul 31.
3
Crossmodal change blindness between vision and touch.视觉与触觉之间的跨通道变化盲视
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2007 Oct;126(2):79-97. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.10.005. Epub 2006 Dec 21.
4
Tactile and visual distractors induce change blindness for tactile stimuli presented on the fingertips.触觉和视觉干扰因素会导致对指尖呈现的触觉刺激产生变化盲视。
Brain Res. 2008 Jun 5;1213:111-9. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.03.015. Epub 2008 Mar 20.
5
When visual transients impair tactile change detection: a novel case of crossmodal change blindness?当视觉瞬变损害触觉变化检测时:一种新型的跨模态变化盲视病例?
Neurosci Lett. 2006 May 8;398(3):280-5. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2006.01.009. Epub 2006 Feb 15.
6
When seeing doesn't matter: assessing the after-effects of tactile distractor processing in the blind and the sighted.当视觉不再重要:评估触觉干扰处理对盲人和视力正常者的后续影响。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2011 Aug;37(4):1174-81. doi: 10.1037/a0022336.
7
Tactile short-term memory for stimuli presented on the fingertips and across the rest of the body surface.指尖及身体其他体表部位所呈现刺激的触觉短期记忆。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 May;73(4):1227-41. doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0098-6.
8
An ERP investigation on visuotactile interactions in peripersonal and extrapersonal space: evidence for the spatial rule.一项关于个人周边空间和个人外部空间中视觉触觉交互作用的事件相关电位研究:空间规则的证据
J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Aug;21(8):1550-9. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21109.
9
Implicit learning for probable changes in a visual change detection task.视觉变化检测任务中对可能变化的内隐学习。
Conscious Cogn. 2008 Dec;17(4):1192-208. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2008.06.011. Epub 2008 Aug 5.
10
Event-related brain potential evidence for implicit change detection: a replication of Fernandez-Duque et al. (2003).内隐变化检测的事件相关脑电位证据:对费尔南德斯 - 杜克等人(2003年)研究的复制
Neurosci Lett. 2008 Dec 31;448(3):236-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2008.10.064. Epub 2008 Nov 1.

引用本文的文献

1
What role does touch play in active entertainment? A narrative review of tactile feedback in gaming.触觉在主动娱乐中扮演着什么角色?关于游戏中触觉反馈的叙述性综述。
Iperception. 2025 May 21;16(3):20416695251336117. doi: 10.1177/20416695251336117. eCollection 2025 May-Jun.
2
Out of touch? Visual load induces inattentional numbness.失去联系?视觉负荷会引发注意力麻木。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Jun;42(6):761-5. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000218. Epub 2016 Mar 14.
3
Spatial attention modulates tactile change detection.空间注意调节触觉变化检测。
Exp Brain Res. 2013 Jan;224(2):295-302. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3311-5. Epub 2012 Oct 30.