Institute for Criminal Law & Criminology, Faculty of Law, Leiden University, The Netherlands.
J Interpers Violence. 2011 Jul;26(11):2186-210. doi: 10.1177/0886260510383032. Epub 2011 Apr 1.
The present study explores the associations between three types of peritraumatic reactions (dissociation, distress, and tonic immobility) and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms in a sample of 125 victims of interpersonal violence who had applied for compensation with the Dutch Victim Compensation Fund (DCVF). In addition, the confounding roles of malingering and fantasy proneness are examined. Results indicate that tonic immobility did not predict PTSD symptom levels when adjusting for other forms of peritraumatic reactions, whereas peritraumatic dissociation and distress did. However, after the effects of malingering and fantasy proneness had been controlled for, malingering is the only factor associated with increased PTSD symptomatology. Implications for policy practice as well as study strengths and limitations are discussed.
本研究探讨了创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)症状与三种创伤性反应(分离、痛苦和僵直反应)之间的关系,研究对象为 125 名因人际暴力而向荷兰受害者赔偿基金(DCVF)申请赔偿的受害者。此外,还研究了装病和幻想倾向的混杂作用。结果表明,在调整其他形式的创伤性反应后,僵直反应与 PTSD 症状水平无关,而创伤性分离和痛苦则有关。然而,在控制了装病和幻想倾向的影响后,只有装病与 PTSD 症状增加有关。讨论了这对政策实践的影响以及研究的优势和局限性。