• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

法律与精神病学:SSRIs、自杀与未能警告药物风险的责任

Law & psychiatry: SSRIs, suicide, and liability for failure to warn of medication risks.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, USA.

出版信息

Psychiatr Serv. 2011 Apr;62(4):347-9. doi: 10.1176/ps.62.4.pss6204_0347.

DOI:10.1176/ps.62.4.pss6204_0347
PMID:21459983
Abstract

When can pharmaceutical companies be held liable for failure to disclose medication risks--such as the link between selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and suicidality of young people? The companies have claimed that Food and Drug Administration approval of labeling information, required by federal law, should preempt liability in state courts. Thus injured patients would either be left without recourse or be compelled to sue the clinicians who prescribed the medication. A recent U.S. Supreme Court decision, however, rejected the preemption defense and opened the door to patients' suits that seek compensation. This column explores the application of this new approach and its implications for the mental health professions.

摘要

制药公司何时会因未能披露药物风险(如选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂与年轻人自杀的关联性)而承担责任?这些公司声称,根据联邦法律要求,食品和药物管理局批准标签信息应先于州法院的责任。因此,受伤的患者要么没有追索权,要么被迫起诉开出处方的临床医生。然而,美国最高法院最近的一项裁决驳回了这种先占抗辩,并为寻求赔偿的患者诉讼打开了大门。本专栏探讨了这种新方法的应用及其对精神卫生专业的影响。

相似文献

1
Law & psychiatry: SSRIs, suicide, and liability for failure to warn of medication risks.法律与精神病学:SSRIs、自杀与未能警告药物风险的责任
Psychiatr Serv. 2011 Apr;62(4):347-9. doi: 10.1176/ps.62.4.pss6204_0347.
2
The Supreme Court, preemption, and malpractice liability.最高法院、优先适用权与医疗事故责任
N Engl J Med. 2009 Feb 5;360(6):559-61. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0809403.
3
Preemption and malpractice liability.优先权与医疗事故责任。
N Engl J Med. 2009 May 21;360(21):2257-8; author reply 2258. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc090478.
4
Legal Liability of Generic vs Brand Drug Manufacturers for Inadequate Product Labels.仿制药与品牌药制造商因产品标签不充分而承担的法律责任。
JAMA. 2018 Aug 14;320(6):547-548. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.8408.
5
Should preemption apply in a pharmaceutical context? An analysis of the preemption debate and what regulatory compliance statutes contribute to the discussion.优先适用原则在制药领域是否适用?对优先适用原则辩论的分析以及监管合规法规对该讨论有何贡献。
Fordham Law Rev. 2008 Oct;77(1):327-63.
6
The impact of Wyeth v. Levine on FDA regulation of prescription drugs.惠氏诉莱文案对美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)处方药监管的影响。
Food Drug Law J. 2010;65(2):247-83, i-ii.
7
The federal preemption debate in pharmaceutical labeling product liability actions.药品标签产品责任诉讼中的联邦优先适用权辩论。
Tort Trial Insur Pract Law J. 2007 Fall;43(1):35-70.
8
Life after Riegel: a fresh look at medical device preemption one year after Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc.里格尔案后的生活:在里格尔诉美敦力公司案一年后重新审视医疗器械优先适用权
Food Drug Law J. 2009;64(2):291-311.
9
Good law from tragic facts--Congress, the FDA, and preemption.从悲剧事实中产生的良法——国会、美国食品药品监督管理局与优先适用权
N Engl J Med. 2009 Sep 17;361(12):1206-11. doi: 10.1056/NEJMhle0902889.
10
Will the Supreme Court finally eliminate ERISA preemption?最高法院最终会消除《雇员退休收入保障法》的优先适用权吗?
Ann Health Law. 2004 Summer;13(2):427-64, table of contents.