• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

早期给予大剂量降脂治疗以避免后续心血管事件:这是否是一种具有成本效益的策略?

Prescribing high-dose lipid-lowering therapy early to avoid subsequent cardiovascular events: is this a cost-effective strategy?

机构信息

School of Health & Related Research, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2012 Jun;19(3):474-83. doi: 10.1177/1741826711406616. Epub 2011 Apr 1.

DOI:10.1177/1741826711406616
PMID:21460076
Abstract

BACKGROUND

While evidence shows high-dose statins reduce cardiovascular events compared with moderate doses in individuals with acute coronary syndrome (ACS), many primary care trusts (PCT) advocate the use of generic simvastatin 40 mg/day for these patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Data from 28 RCTs were synthesized using a mixed treatment comparison model. A Markov model was used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of treatments taking into account adherence and the likely reduction in cost for atorvastatin when the patent expires. There is a clear dose-response: rosuvastatin 40 mg/day produces the greatest reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (56%) followed by atorvastatin 80 mg/day (52%), and simvastatin 40 mg/day (37%). Using a threshold of £20,000 per QALY, if adherence levels in general practice are similar to those observed in RCTs, all three higher dose statins would be considered cost-effective compared to simvastatin 40 mg/day. Using the net benefits of the treatments, rosuvastatin 40 mg/day is estimated to be the most cost-effective alternative. If the cost of atorvastatin reduces in line with that observed for simvastatin, atorvastatin 80 mg/day is estimated to be the most cost-effective alternative.

CONCLUSION

Our analyses show that current PCT policies intended to minimize primary care drug acquisition costs result in suboptimal care.

摘要

背景

虽然有证据表明高剂量他汀类药物与急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者的中等剂量相比能降低心血管事件,但许多初级保健信托基金(PCT)主张为这些患者使用通用辛伐他汀 40mg/天。

方法和结果

使用混合治疗比较模型综合了 28 项 RCT 的数据。采用马尔可夫模型来评估治疗的成本效益,同时考虑到依从性以及专利到期时阿托伐他汀成本可能降低的情况。存在明确的剂量反应关系:每天服用 40mg 瑞舒伐他汀可使低密度脂蛋白胆固醇降低 56%,其次是每天服用 80mg 阿托伐他汀(降低 52%)和每天服用 40mg 辛伐他汀(降低 37%)。如果使用每 QALY 20,000 英镑的阈值,如果一般实践中的依从水平与 RCT 中观察到的水平相似,那么与辛伐他汀 40mg/天相比,所有三种高剂量他汀类药物都被认为是具有成本效益的。使用治疗的净效益,每天服用 40mg 瑞舒伐他汀被估计为最具成本效益的替代药物。如果阿托伐他汀的成本降低与辛伐他汀观察到的情况一致,则每天服用 80mg 阿托伐他汀被估计为最具成本效益的替代药物。

结论

我们的分析表明,目前旨在尽量降低初级保健药物获取成本的 PCT 政策导致了次优的护理。

相似文献

1
Prescribing high-dose lipid-lowering therapy early to avoid subsequent cardiovascular events: is this a cost-effective strategy?早期给予大剂量降脂治疗以避免后续心血管事件:这是否是一种具有成本效益的策略?
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2012 Jun;19(3):474-83. doi: 10.1177/1741826711406616. Epub 2011 Apr 1.
2
Cost-effectiveness of high-dose atorvastatin compared with regular dose simvastatin.高剂量阿托伐他汀与常规剂量辛伐他汀的成本效益比较。
Eur Heart J. 2007 Jun;28(12):1448-53. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehm020. Epub 2007 Mar 19.
3
Cost-effectiveness of high, moderate and low-dose statins in the prevention of vascular events in the Brazilian public health system.高剂量、中剂量和低剂量他汀类药物在巴西公共卫生系统中预防血管事件的成本效益
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2015 Jan;104(1):32-44. doi: 10.5935/abc.20140173. Epub 2014 Nov 18.
4
Cost-effectiveness analysis of rosuvastatin vs generic atorvastatin in Spain.西班牙阿托伐他汀与罗苏伐他汀的成本效果分析。
J Med Econ. 2012;15 Suppl 1:45-54. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2012.726674. Epub 2012 Sep 12.
5
Rosuvastatin is cost-effective in treating patients to low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol goals compared with atorvastatin, pravastatin and simvastatin: analysis of the STELLAR trial.与阿托伐他汀、普伐他汀和辛伐他汀相比,瑞舒伐他汀在将患者低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平降至目标值方面具有成本效益:STELLAR试验分析。
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2005 Feb;12(1):18-28.
6
Statin's cost-effectiveness: a Canadian analysis of commonly prescribed generic and brand name statins.他汀类药物的成本效益:加拿大对常用通用名和品牌名他汀类药物的分析。
Can J Clin Pharmacol. 2007 Summer;14(2):e205-14. Epub 2007 Jun 5.
7
Budget impact of rosuvastatin initiation in high-risk hyperlipidemic patients from a US managed care perspective.从美国管理式医疗角度看起始用瑞舒伐他汀治疗高危血脂异常患者的预算影响。
J Med Econ. 2013 Jul;16(7):907-16. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2013.801350. Epub 2013 May 23.
8
Cost-effectiveness analysis of rosuvastatin versus atorvastatin, simvastatin, and pravastatin from a Canadian health system perspective.从加拿大卫生系统角度比较瑞舒伐他汀与阿托伐他汀、辛伐他汀及普伐他汀的成本效益分析
Clin Ther. 2008 Jul;30(7):1345-57. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(08)80061-6.
9
Cost-effectiveness of intensive atorvastatin treatment in high-risk patients compared with usual care in a postgeneric statin market: economic analysis of the Aggressive Lipid-lowering Initiation Abates New Cardiac Events (ALLIANCE) study.在仿制药他汀市场中,强化阿托伐他汀治疗高危患者与常规治疗相比的成本效益:积极降脂起始减少新的心脏事件(ALLIANCE)研究的经济分析
Clin Ther. 2008;30 Pt 2:2204-16. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.12.007.
10
Cost-effectiveness of intensive lipid lowering therapy with 80 mg of atorvastatin, versus 10 mg of atorvastatin, for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in Canada.在加拿大,与10毫克阿托伐他汀相比,80毫克阿托伐他汀强化降脂治疗对心血管疾病二级预防的成本效益。
Can J Clin Pharmacol. 2009 Summer;16(2):e331-45. Epub 2009 Jun 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-Effectiveness of the CNIC-Polypill Strategy Compared With Separate Monocomponents in Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease in Portugal: The MERCURY Study.在葡萄牙心血管和脑血管疾病二级预防中,与单一成分药物分别使用相比,CNIC复方药丸策略的成本效益:MERCURY研究
J Health Econ Outcomes Res. 2022 Nov 22;9(2):134-146. doi: 10.36469/001c.39768. eCollection 2022.
2
The Cost-Effectiveness and Cost-Utility of Statin Drug for the Treatment of Patients with Cardiovascular Disease, A Systematic Review.他汀类药物治疗心血管疾病患者的成本效益和成本效用:一项系统评价
Int J Prev Med. 2021 May 15;12:39. doi: 10.4103/ijpvm.IJPVM_125_20. eCollection 2021.
3
Evaluating the Cost-Effectiveness of Celecoxib versus Ibuprofen and Naproxen in Patients with Osteoarthritis in United Arab Emirates Based on the PRECISION Trial.
基于PRECISION试验评估塞来昔布与布洛芬和萘普生在阿联酋骨关节炎患者中的成本效益
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2021 May 19;13:409-420. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S280556. eCollection 2021.
4
The history of proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin-9 inhibitors and their role in the treatment of cardiovascular disease.前蛋白转化酶枯草溶菌素9抑制剂的历史及其在心血管疾病治疗中的作用。
Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2020 May 30;11:2040622320924569. doi: 10.1177/2040622320924569. eCollection 2020.
5
Cholesterol-lowering drugs: science and marketing.降胆固醇药物:科学与营销。
J R Soc Med. 2017 Feb;110(2):57-64. doi: 10.1177/0141076816681951. Epub 2017 Jan 13.
6
Cost-effectiveness and public health benefit of secondary cardiovascular disease prevention from improved adherence using a polypill in the UK.在英国使用复方制剂提高依从性对继发性心血管疾病预防的成本效益及公共卫生效益
BMJ Open. 2015 May 9;5(5):e007111. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007111.