Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2011 Feb;32(2):125-30. doi: 10.1086/657942.
Limited data on the risk of peripherally inserted central venous catheter-associated bloodstream infections (PICC BSIs) in hospitalized patients are available. In 2007, dedicated intravenous therapy nurses were no longer available to place difficult peripheral intravenous catheters or provide PICC care Barnes-Jewish Hospital.
To determine the hospital-wide incidence of PICC BSIs and to assess the effect of discontinuing intravenous therapy service on PICC use and PICC BSI rates.
A 1,252-bed tertiary care teaching hospital.
A 31-month retrospective cohort study was performed. PICC BSIs were defined using National Healthcare Safety Network criteria.
In total, 163 PICC BSIs were identified (3.13 BSIs per 1,000 catheter-days). PICC use was higher in intensive care units (ICUs) than non-ICU areas (PICC utilization ratio, 0.109 vs 0.059 catheter-days per patient-day for ICU vs non-ICU; rate ratio [RR], 1.84 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.78-1.91]). PICC BSI rates were higher in ICUs (4.79 vs 2.79 episodes per 1,000 catheter-days; RR, 1.7 [95% CI, 1.10-2.61]). PICC use increased hospital-wide after the intravenous therapy service was discontinued (0.049 vs 0.097 catheter-days per patient-day; P =.01), but PICC BSI rates did not change (2.68 vs 3.63 episodes per 1,000 catheter-days; P =.06). Of PICC BSIs, 73% occurred in non-ICU patients.
PICC use and PICC BSI rates were higher in ICUs; however, most of the PICC BSIs occurred in non-ICU areas. Reduction in intravenous therapy services was associated with increased PICC use across the hospital, but PICC BSI rates did not increase.
关于住院患者外周中心静脉置管相关血流感染(PICC BSIs)的风险,目前仅有有限的数据。2007 年,巴恩斯-犹太医院不再配备专门的静脉治疗护士来放置困难的外周静脉导管或提供 PICC 护理。
确定全院范围内 PICC BSIs 的发生率,并评估停止静脉治疗服务对 PICC 使用和 PICC BSI 发生率的影响。
一家拥有 1252 张床位的三级保健教学医院。
进行了一项为期 31 个月的回顾性队列研究。使用国家医疗保健安全网络标准定义 PICC BSIs。
共确定了 163 例 PICC BSIs(每 1000 个导管日发生 3.13 例 BSIs)。重症监护病房(ICU)的 PICC 使用量高于非 ICU 区域(PICC 使用比率,ICU 为 0.109 比非 ICU 为 0.059 导管日/患者日;率比[RR],1.84[95%置信区间{CI},1.78-1.91])。ICU 的 PICC BSI 发生率较高(4.79 比每 1000 个导管日发生 2.79 例;RR,1.7[95%CI,1.10-2.61])。停止静脉治疗服务后,全院范围内的 PICC 使用量增加(0.049 比非 ICU 患者的 0.097 导管日/患者日;P =.01),但 PICC BSI 发生率没有变化(2.68 比每 1000 个导管日发生 3.63 例;P =.06)。PICC BSIs 中,73%发生在非 ICU 患者中。
ICU 中 PICC 使用和 PICC BSI 发生率较高;然而,大多数 PICC BSIs 发生在非 ICU 区域。减少静脉治疗服务与医院内 PICC 使用量增加有关,但 PICC BSI 发生率没有增加。