Suppr超能文献

心脏骤停中心标准对院外转运实践的区域性影响。

Regional impact of cardiac arrest center criteria on out-of-hospital transportation practices.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261, USA.

出版信息

Prehosp Emerg Care. 2011 Jul-Sep;15(3):381-7. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2011.561409. Epub 2011 Apr 4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cardiac arrest center (CAC) criteria are not well defined, nor is their potential impact on current emergency medical services (EMS) transportation practices for post-cardiac arrest (PCA) patients. In addition to the availability of emergent cardiac catheterization (CATH) and therapeutic hypothermia (TH), high-volume centers and those with PCA protocols have been associated with improved outcomes. Objectives. This study aimed 1) to identify the PCA treatment capabilities of receiving hospitals in a 10-county regional EMS system without official CAC designation and 2) to determine the proportion of PCA patients who are transported to hospitals meeting three proposed CAC definitions. We hypothesized that a majority of patients are already transported to hospitals that meet proposed CAC criteria.

METHODS

We distributed a survey to 34 receiving hospitals to determine availability and volume of CATH, TH, a PCA protocol, and a 24-hour intensivist. We conducted a retrospective study of adult, nontrauma cardiac arrest patients transported with a pulse from 2006 to 2008 for 16 EMS agencies. The proportions of patients transported to hospitals meeting three CAC criteria were compared: criteria A (availability of CATH and TH), criteria B (criteria A, >200 CATHs per year, and a PCA protocol), and criteria C (criteria B and a 24-hour intensivist).

RESULTS

Data were obtained from 31 of 34 hospitals (91.1%), of which 10 (32.3%) met criteria A, seven (22.6%) met criteria B, and six (19.4%) met criteria C. Of 1,193 cardiac arrest patients, 46 (3.9%) were excluded because of transport to a pediatric, closed, or out-of-region hospital. There were 335 patients (81.1%) with return of spontaneous circulation and a pulse present upon arrival at the destination facility transported to hospitals meeting criteria A, 304 patients (73.6%) transported to hospitals meeting criteria B, and 273 patients (66.1%) transported to hospitals meeting criteria C.

CONCLUSIONS

In a region without official CAC designation, only one-third of hospitals meet basic CAC criteria (CATH and TH), but those facilities receive 81% of PCA patients. Fewer patients (66%) are transported to hospitals meeting more stringent CAC criteria. These data describe the potential impact of developing a CAC policy based on current transportation practices.

摘要

背景

心脏骤停中心(CAC)的标准尚未明确,其对当前心脏骤停后(PCA)患者的急救医疗服务(EMS)转运实践的潜在影响也不明确。除了紧急心脏导管插入术(CATH)和治疗性低温(TH)的可用性外,大容量中心和有 PCA 方案的中心与改善预后有关。目的:本研究旨在 1)确定在一个 10 县区域 EMS 系统中没有官方 CAC 指定的接收医院的 PCA 治疗能力,2)确定被转运至符合三个拟议 CAC 定义的医院的 PCA 患者比例。我们假设大多数患者已经被转运至符合拟议 CAC 标准的医院。

方法

我们向 34 家接收医院发放了一份调查问卷,以确定 CATH、TH、PCA 方案和 24 小时重症监护医师的可用性和数量。我们对 2006 年至 2008 年 16 家 EMS 机构转运的有脉搏的成年非创伤性心脏骤停患者进行了回顾性研究。比较了符合三个 CAC 标准的患者的转运比例:标准 A(CATH 和 TH 的可用性)、标准 B(标准 A,每年 >200 次 CATH 和 PCA 方案)和标准 C(标准 B 和 24 小时重症监护医师)。

结果

从 34 家医院中获得了 31 家(91.1%)的数据,其中 10 家(32.3%)符合标准 A,7 家(22.6%)符合标准 B,6 家(19.4%)符合标准 C。在 1193 例心脏骤停患者中,46 例(3.9%)因转运至儿科、关闭或区域外医院而被排除在外。有 335 例(81.1%)自主循环恢复且到达目的地时存在脉搏的患者被转运至符合标准 A 的医院,304 例(73.6%)被转运至符合标准 B 的医院,273 例(66.1%)被转运至符合标准 C 的医院。

结论

在没有官方 CAC 指定的地区,只有三分之一的医院符合基本 CAC 标准(CATH 和 TH),但这些医院接收了 81%的 PCA 患者。符合更严格 CAC 标准的患者(66%)较少被转运。这些数据描述了根据当前转运实践制定 CAC 政策的潜在影响。

相似文献

5
Availability and utilization of cardiac resuscitation centers.心脏复苏中心的可及性与利用率
West J Emerg Med. 2014 Nov;15(7):758-63. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2014.8.21877. Epub 2014 Sep 19.

本文引用的文献

2
24-hour on-site intensivist in the intensive care unit: yes.重症监护病房配备24小时现场重症医学专家:是。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010 Jun 15;181(12):1279-80. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201004-0676ED.
7
Regionalization of postcardiac arrest care.心脏骤停后护理的区域化
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2009 Jun;15(3):221-7. doi: 10.1097/mcc.0b013e328329c293.
9
Regionalization of cardiac arrest care.心脏骤停救治的区域化
Crit Care Med. 2009 Apr;37(4):1534; author reply 1535. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31819d2f75.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验