University Medical Center at Princeton, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA.
HERD. 2011 Winter;4(2):23-35. doi: 10.1177/193758671100400204.
To determine differences in the rate of falls, healthcare-acquired infections (HAIs), and the degree of social isolation in hospitalized older adults admitted to private versus semi-private rooms.
The American Institute of Architects recommends that private rooms become the industry standard for all new construction of acute care hospitals. Healthcare design researchers contend that private rooms decrease infection, facilitate healthcare workers' efficiency, provide space for families, and afford greater access to privacy. Although links between room type and health outcomes have been described in the literature, the actual relationship between these two variables has not been determined, nor is it clear whether a one-size-fits-all approach to hospital design is appropriate for all patient populations, particularly older adults.
This retrospective case comparative design utilized a sample of patients admitted to the University Medical Center of Princeton in 2006 and received full internal review board approval. Patient records were randomly selected through the admission/discharge/transfer system of the hospital and then divided into two groups based on room type. Data collected included demographics, incidence of falls, HAIs, and risk of social isolation.
All patients were more than 65 years old and had been admitted to the hospital for a variety of diagnoses. Length of stay was between 3 and 10 days. There was no significant difference between the type of room and the likelihood of falling (p = .37), however the relative risk of falling in a private room was 4.01. There was no significant difference in the occurrence of HAIs based on room type (p = 1.0). The risk-of-social-isolation variable was unable to significantly affect which hospitalized older adults would suffer a negative outcome, fall, or HAI (p = .52).
Room type may play a role in the occurrence of falls in hospitalized older adults, but room type alone does not increase the chance of acquiring an infection in the hospital. Nor does the risk of social isolation affect the likelihood of an adverse outcome.
确定入住私人病房和半私人病房的老年住院患者在跌倒率、医源性感染(HAI)和社会隔离程度方面的差异。
美国建筑师协会建议,私人病房应成为所有新建急性护理医院的行业标准。医疗保健设计研究人员认为,私人病房可以减少感染、提高医护人员的工作效率、为家属提供空间,并提供更大的隐私空间。尽管文献中已经描述了病房类型与健康结果之间的联系,但这两个变量之间的实际关系尚未确定,也不清楚一刀切的医院设计方法是否适合所有患者群体,尤其是老年人。
本回顾性病例对照设计利用了 2006 年入住普林斯顿大学医学中心的患者样本,并获得了内部审查委员会的全面批准。通过医院的入院/出院/转院系统随机选择患者记录,然后根据病房类型将患者分为两组。收集的数据包括人口统计学数据、跌倒发生率、HAI 和社会隔离风险。
所有患者年龄均在 65 岁以上,因各种诊断住院。住院时间为 3 至 10 天。病房类型与跌倒的可能性之间没有显著差异(p=0.37),但私人病房跌倒的相对风险为 4.01。根据病房类型,HAI 的发生没有显著差异(p=1.0)。社会隔离风险变量不能显著影响哪些住院老年人会遭受负面后果、跌倒或 HAI(p=0.52)。
病房类型可能会影响老年住院患者跌倒的发生,但仅病房类型并不能增加患者在医院感染的机会。社会隔离的风险也不会影响不良结果的可能性。