Suppr超能文献

Evaluation of three commonly used pressure ulcer risk assessment scales.

作者信息

O'Tuathail Claire, Taqi Rebecca

机构信息

Aras Mayola, School of Nursing and Midwifery, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.

出版信息

Br J Nurs. 2011;20(6):S27-8, S30, S32 Passim. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2011.20.Sup2.S27.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Pressure ulcers are a huge concern for health professionals, cause suffering to patients and are associated with increased morbidity.

AIM

This literature review provides an overview of the literature on the three most commonly used pressure ulcer risk assessment scales-the Waterlow scale, the Braden scale and the Norton scale.

METHOD

A search was undertaken through the databases CINAHL, MEDLINE, British Nursing Index, ProQuest and Cochrane Library. Key terms included pressure ulcers, pressure sores, risk assessment, Braden scale, Norton scale and Waterlow scale.

RESULTS

While risk assessment scales are beneficial they should not be used without the aid of nurses' clinical judgment. Over-predicting pressure ulcers is a common problem when using risk assessment scales. However, ethical considerations preclude investigation into the predictive capacity of a scale. Ongoing education in the prevention and management of pressure ulcers is essential for nurses. Risk assessment scales should be adapted to suit the needs of the clinical setting in which they are used.

CONCLUSION

The Waterlow scale is the most widely used risk assessment scale in the UK and Ireland, even though there is no evidence to suggest it is more effective than the other most commonly used scales.

摘要

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验