Laurenson Mary, Brocklehurst Hilary
University of Hull, Hull, UK. M.C.
Br J Community Nurs. 2011 Apr;16(4):184-90. doi: 10.12968/bjcn.2011.16.4.184.
This UK-based empirical research investigates interprofessionalism and personalization to assess their potential to achieve quality care provision for people with long-term conditions. Governmental policies extol the virtues of interprofessionalism and personalization to drive modernization forward, however, change requires the commitment of health and social care professionals. Therefore the complexity of turning policy into practice requires continual review to ensure policy ideals become practice realities rather than speculative rhetoric. This paper examines interprofessional working (IPW) and interprofessional education (IPE) by analysing the experiences and working relationships of professionals from different professions and their potential impact upon personalization initiatives. The conclusion argues that educational providers and professional awarding bodies need to enshrine interprofessionalism into curricula and qualification accreditation thereby instilling collaboration intrinsically into care provision.
这项基于英国的实证研究调查了跨专业协作和个性化，以评估它们为长期病患者提供优质护理的潜力。政府政策颂扬跨专业协作和个性化的优点以推动现代化进程，然而，变革需要健康和社会护理专业人员的投入。因此，将政策转化为实践的复杂性需要持续审查，以确保政策理想成为实践现实，而非空洞的言辞。本文通过分析来自不同专业的专业人员的经验和工作关系及其对个性化举措的潜在影响，审视了跨专业工作（IPW）和跨专业教育（IPE）。结论认为，教育提供者和专业授予机构需要将跨专业协作纳入课程和资格认证，从而将协作本质上融入护理服务中。
