• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

僵硬膝关节与灵活膝关节的全膝关节置换术对比

Total knee arthroplasty in stiff knee compared with flexible knees.

作者信息

Fosco M, Filanti M, Amendola L, Savarino L M, Tigani D

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute, University of Bologna, Via Pupilli 1, 40136 Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

Musculoskelet Surg. 2011 Apr;95(1):7-12. doi: 10.1007/s12306-011-0099-6. Epub 2011 Mar 9.

DOI:10.1007/s12306-011-0099-6
PMID:21472529
Abstract

This retrospective study was done to evaluate the results of total knee arthroplasty performed on 32 patients with stiff knee, having a preoperative arc of movement between 0° and 50° (average 30°). This group of patients were matched with a group of 32 flexible knees, randomly selected from the same cohort of patients who underwent knee arthroplasty in our ward. At a mean follow-up of 4.5 years (min 2, max 11 years), seven patients of the stiff group reported complications (21.8% overall): four prosthetic infection that successively underwent removal of the implant, one skin necrosis 4 months after the intervention, one early contracture and one late stiffness of the knee. In the control group, in two cases, there was substitution of the implant due to periprosthetic infection. At the end of the study period, the clinical evaluation was not possible in four patients of the stiff and in two patients of the control group who underwent revision of the prosthetic components. An excellent or good clinical result was obtained in 92% of stiff group and in 96% of the control group patients. Although the final results achieved in these patients are worse than those of patients with flexible knee due to disadvantageous preoperative conditions and high complication rate, our results demonstrate the efficacy of the arthroplasty procedure as treatment of stiff knee.

摘要

本回顾性研究旨在评估对32例膝关节僵硬患者行全膝关节置换术的结果,这些患者术前活动弧度在0°至50°之间(平均30°)。该组患者与从我们病房接受膝关节置换术的同一队列患者中随机选取的32例膝关节活动灵活的患者进行匹配。平均随访4.5年(最短2年,最长11年),僵硬组有7例患者报告出现并发症(总体发生率为21.8%):4例假体感染,随后进行了假体移除;1例术后4个月出现皮肤坏死;1例早期膝关节挛缩和1例晚期膝关节僵硬。在对照组中,有2例因假体周围感染而更换了假体。在研究期末,僵硬组有4例患者和对照组有2例患者进行了假体部件翻修,无法进行临床评估。僵硬组92%的患者和对照组96%的患者获得了优良的临床结果。尽管由于术前条件不利和并发症发生率高,这些患者最终取得的结果比膝关节活动灵活的患者差,但我们的结果证明了关节置换术作为治疗膝关节僵硬的有效性。

相似文献

1
Total knee arthroplasty in stiff knee compared with flexible knees.僵硬膝关节与灵活膝关节的全膝关节置换术对比
Musculoskelet Surg. 2011 Apr;95(1):7-12. doi: 10.1007/s12306-011-0099-6. Epub 2011 Mar 9.
2
Clinical outcome of posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty using an increased flexion gap in patients with preoperative stiffness.术前僵硬患者采用增加屈曲间隙的后稳定型全膝关节置换术的临床疗效。
Bone Joint J. 2020 Apr;102-B(4):426-433. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B4.BJJ-2018-1404.R3.
3
A Comparative Study on the Long-Term Outcome of Total Knee Arthroplasty Performed for Knees Stiff in Extension and Those Stiff in Flexion.膝关节伸直位僵硬和膝关节屈曲位僵硬行全膝关节置换术的长期疗效比较研究
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Nov;32(11):3396-3403. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.06.027. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
4
Improved clinical outcomes after revision arthroplasty with a hinged implant for severely stiff total knee arthroplasty.铰链型假体翻修治疗严重僵硬性全膝关节置换术的临床转归改善。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Apr;27(4):1043-1048. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5235-5. Epub 2018 Oct 26.
5
Outcome after total knee arthroplasty in haemophilic patients with stiff knees.血友病性膝关节僵硬患者全膝关节置换术后的结果
Haemophilia. 2015 Jul;21(4):e300-5. doi: 10.1111/hae.12698. Epub 2015 Apr 30.
6
Hinged versus CCK revision arthroplasty for the stiff total knee.用于僵硬全膝关节的铰链式与CCK翻修关节成形术
Knee. 2019 Jan;26(1):222-227. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2018.10.012. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
7
[Impact of Preoperative Knee Stiffness on the Postoperative Outcome after Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients with Haemophilia].[血友病患者全膝关节置换术前膝关节僵硬对术后结果的影响]
Z Orthop Unfall. 2015 Oct;153(5):526-32. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1557768. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
8
Does the medial pivot knee improve the clinical and radiographic outcome of total knee arthroplasty? A single centre study on two hundred and ninety seven patients.内侧铰链膝关节置换术是否改善全膝关节置换术的临床和影像学结果?单中心 297 例患者研究。
Int Orthop. 2020 Feb;44(2):291-299. doi: 10.1007/s00264-019-04462-3. Epub 2019 Dec 21.
9
Short-term Follow-up of Antibiotic-loaded Articulating Cement Spacers in Two-stage Revision of Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Case Series.感染性全膝关节置换二期翻修中抗生素骨水泥关节连接型间隔物的短期随访:病例系列研究
Orthop Surg. 2018 May;10(2):128-133. doi: 10.1111/os.12381. Epub 2018 May 17.
10
Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty.全膝关节置换术后的僵硬
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Sep;87 Suppl 1(Pt 2):264-70. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E-00345.

引用本文的文献

1
Total knee arthroplasty exhibits satisfactory long-term clinical efficacy in the treatment of hemophilia patients with stiff knees.全膝关节置换术在治疗血友病性膝关节僵硬患者方面显示出令人满意的长期临床疗效。
Front Surg. 2023 Jan 6;9:1014844. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1014844. eCollection 2022.
2
Classification-Based Management of Stiff/Ankylosed Knees.基于分类的僵硬/强直膝关节管理
Indian J Orthop. 2021 Jul 29;55(5):1158-1174. doi: 10.1007/s43465-021-00457-8. eCollection 2021 Oct.
3
Results of total knee arthroplasty for painless, stiff knees.

本文引用的文献

1
Does TKA improve functional outcome and range of motion in patients with stiff knees?全膝关节置换术能否改善膝关节僵硬患者的功能结局和活动范围?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 May;467(5):1348-54. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0445-7. Epub 2008 Aug 20.
2
Comparison of total knee arthroplasty in stiff and ankylosed knees.僵硬膝关节与强直膝关节全膝关节置换术的比较
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Oct;451:87-95. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000229313.20760.13.
3
Total knee arthroplasty in stiff and ankylosed knees.僵硬和强直膝关节的全膝关节置换术。
无痛性膝关节僵硬的全膝关节置换术结果。
Knee Surg Relat Res. 2020 Nov 17;32(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s43019-020-00081-0.
4
Acquired Idiopathic Stiffness After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.全膝关节置换术后获得性特发性僵硬:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Jul 17;101(14):1320-1330. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.01217.
5
Does the severity or cause of preoperative stiffness affect the clinical results and range of motion after total knee arthroplasty?术前僵硬的严重程度或病因是否会影响全膝关节置换术后的临床结果和活动范围?
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 11;13(10):e0205168. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205168. eCollection 2018.
6
Pseudoaneurysm of the superior lateral genicular artery: case report of a rare complication after total knee arthroplasty.膝上外侧动脉假性动脉瘤:全膝关节置换术后罕见并发症的病例报告
Patient Saf Surg. 2013 May 20;7:15. doi: 10.1186/1754-9493-7-15. eCollection 2013.
7
Reason for revision TKA predicts clinical outcome: prospective evaluation of 150 consecutive patients with 2-years followup.修订原因 TKA 预测临床结果:前瞻性评估 150 例连续患者,随访 2 年。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Jul;471(7):2296-302. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-2940-8. Epub 2013 Mar 30.
J Arthroplasty. 2005 Aug;20(5):585-90. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2005.04.002.
4
Total knee arthroplasty in stiff knees after previous infection.既往感染后僵硬膝关节的全膝关节置换术。
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005 Mar;87(3):333-6. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.87b3.15457.
5
Factors affecting postoperative range of motion after total knee arthroplasty.全膝关节置换术后影响关节活动范围的因素。
J Knee Surg. 2004 Oct;17(4):196-202. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1248221.
6
Constraint in total knee arthroplasty: when and what?全膝关节置换术中的限制因素:何时以及何种因素?
J Arthroplasty. 2003 Apr;18(3 Suppl 1):51-4. doi: 10.1054/arth.2003.50103.
7
Outcome of knee arthroplasty in patients with poor preoperative range of motion.术前活动度较差患者的膝关节置换术结果
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002 Nov(404):203-7. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200211000-00033.
8
Total knee arthroplasty after spontaneous osseous ankylosis and takedown of formal knee fusion.自发性骨性强直及原膝关节融合松解术后的全膝关节置换术。
J Arthroplasty. 2000 Jun;15(4):453-60. doi: 10.1054/arth.2000.4640.
9
Total knee arthroplasty in bony ankylosis in gross flexion.严重屈曲位骨性强直患者的全膝关节置换术。
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999 Mar;81(2):296-300. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.81b2.9183.
10
Primary total knee arthroplasty in stiff and ankylosed knees.僵硬和强直膝关节的初次全膝关节置换术
Am J Knee Surg. 1998 Winter;11(1):20-3.