Suppr超能文献

[眼科领域VEGF抑制剂专家调查结果]

[Results of an expert survey on VEGF inhibitors in ophthalmology].

作者信息

Kühn T

机构信息

ContraCare GmbH, Fürth.

出版信息

Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2011 Jul;228(7):607-12. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1245827. Epub 2011 Apr 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

VEGF inhibition is an important treatment option for patients with eye diseases like wet AMD or diabetic eye diseases. Concerning VEGF inhibition in Germany's ophthalmology there is lack of health-care data.

METHODOLOGY

A standardised telephone survey addressing treating ophthalmologists in Germany was used to acquire information in terms of VEGF inhibitors in ophthalmology.

RESULTS

44.9 % considered ranibizumab (Lucentis®) and bevacizumab (Avastin®) as equal regarding efficacy and safety. Even so ranibizumab captured with 69.8 % regarding patients under treatment the greatest market share. 26.1 % estimated that less than 10 % of patients with diabetic eye diseases are under treatment while 23.4 % assumed that at present all treatable patients are under treatment. The integration of IVI into the EBM is recommended by only 9.4 %. Using the content of one vial for the treatment of more than one patient is challenged by 66.4 % of all participating ophthalmologists. 50.7 % of these would accept the splitting procedure on condition that proof of drug quality in terms of efficacy and safety is given.

DISCUSSION

The dominance of ranibizumab is based upon a forensic discussion about off-label use of drugs and liability of the treating physicians. In this connection it should not be forgotten that at the end of 2009 the approval of pegaptanib (Macugen®) and ranibizumab covers exclusively the indication "neovascular AMD". Since Novartis gained new indication for Lucentis in EU for vision loss due to diabetic macular edema (DME) it is to be expected that VEGF inhibition will become first line for patients with DME. The cost effectiveness of the anti-VEGF therapy in ophthalmology is based upon the treatment of several patients with one drug package. The integration of IVI into the EBM is not recommended by the majority of Germany's ophthalmologists because neither would the patients benefit nor would the health-care data transparency increase.

CONCLUSION

To evaluate the ophthalmological anti-VEGF market in Germany and to identify and secure the treatment quality a recurring acquisition of health-care data with following management actions is needed.

摘要

背景

血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)抑制是湿性年龄相关性黄斑变性(wet AMD)或糖尿病性眼病等眼部疾病患者的重要治疗选择。在德国眼科领域,关于VEGF抑制方面缺乏医疗保健数据。

方法

采用标准化电话调查,面向德国的眼科治疗医生,以获取眼科领域VEGF抑制剂的相关信息。

结果

44.9%的人认为雷珠单抗(Lucentis®)和贝伐单抗(Avastin®)在疗效和安全性方面相当。即便如此,雷珠单抗在接受治疗的患者中占据了69.8%的最大市场份额。26.1%的人估计糖尿病眼病患者中接受治疗的比例不到10%,而23.4%的人认为目前所有可治疗的患者都已接受治疗。只有9.4%的人建议将眼内注射(IVI)纳入循证医学(EBM)。66.4%的参与调查的眼科医生对使用一管药物治疗多名患者提出质疑。其中50.7%的人表示,若能提供药物疗效和安全性方面的质量证明,他们会接受药物分割使用的做法。

讨论

雷珠单抗的主导地位基于关于药物标签外使用及治疗医生责任的一场法医讨论。在此方面不应忘记,2009年底,培加他尼(Macugen®)和雷珠单抗的获批仅涵盖“新生血管性AMD”这一适应症。自诺华公司在欧盟为Lucentis获得因糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)导致视力丧失的新适应症以来,可以预期VEGF抑制将成为DME患者的一线治疗方法。眼科抗VEGF治疗的成本效益基于用一个药包治疗多名患者。德国大多数眼科医生不建议将眼内注射纳入循证医学,因为这既不会使患者受益,也不会提高医疗保健数据的透明度。

结论

为评估德国眼科抗VEGF市场,并识别和确保治疗质量,需要通过后续管理行动定期获取医疗保健数据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验