Barros M J, Rees P J
Department of Thoracic Medicine, United Medical School, Guy's Hospital, London, U.K.
Respir Med. 1990 Sep;84(5):371-5. doi: 10.1016/s0954-6111(08)80071-6.
We have performed a retrospective survey on 296 patients, who attended the Respiratory Function Unit at Guy's Hospital to have their bronchodilator responses (BR) tested. The aim of the study was to see the effect of ipratropium bromide (IB) in a group of patients with incomplete reversibility after salbutamol (S). Patients were routinely given salbutamol and ipratropium bromide sequentially by inhalation, and spirometric changes were recorded after each drug. We identified two groups: Group A, 95 patients with FEV1 response greater than or equal to 0.2 l after either drug and FEV1 less than 80% predicted after salbutamol; and, Group B, 49 with change in FEV1 less than 0.02 l, FVC less than 80% predicted after salbutamol and an improvement in FVC greater than or equal to 0.33 l. Seventy-nine of the 95 patients in Group A also had an FVC response. In Group A, age was negatively correlated with response to salbutamol (r = -0.41, P less than 0.0001), and within Group B baseline FVC was negatively correlated with response to ipratropium bromide (r = -0.30, P = 0.03). There were no differences in age, sex, or doses given to each group (median dose: salbutamol, 800 micrograms, ipratropium bromide 120 micrograms). Baseline FEV1 and FVC (% predicted) were significantly higher in FEV1 responders. Mean (SD) FEV1 were 43% (14) in Group A vs. 29% (14) in Group B, while FVC were 62% (16) vs. 47% (13), P less than 0.001. Responses to ipratropium bromide were more frequent in Group B; in Group A 87% improved after salbutamol and 26% after ipratropium bromide, while in Group B 68% responded to salbutamol and 47% to ipratropium bromide (P = 0.03). Most patients responded to salbutamol, but in 33% ipratropium bromide had an additional effect. The FEV1 response to salbutamol declined with age. Isolated volume responders had more severe airflow obstruction, had less responses to salbutamol and were more likely to show a response to ipratropium bromide. These results support a trial of ipratropium bromide in patients with inadequate beta responsiveness, especially in those with severe airflow obstruction.
我们对296名到盖伊医院呼吸功能科进行支气管扩张剂反应(BR)测试的患者进行了回顾性调查。该研究的目的是观察异丙托溴铵(IB)对一组使用沙丁胺醇(S)后可逆性不完全的患者的影响。患者常规依次吸入沙丁胺醇和异丙托溴铵,并记录每种药物后的肺量计变化。我们确定了两组:A组,95名患者在使用任何一种药物后FEV1反应≥0.2升,且使用沙丁胺醇后FEV1低于预测值的80%;B组,49名患者FEV1变化<0.02升,使用沙丁胺醇后FVC低于预测值的80%,且FVC改善≥0.33升。A组95名患者中有79名也有FVC反应。在A组中,年龄与沙丁胺醇反应呈负相关(r = -0.41,P<0.0001),在B组中,基线FVC与异丙托溴铵反应呈负相关(r = -0.30,P = 0.03)。两组在年龄、性别或给药剂量方面无差异(中位剂量:沙丁胺醇800微克,异丙托溴铵120微克)。FEV1反应者的基线FEV1和FVC(预测值%)显著更高。A组的平均(标准差)FEV1为43%(14),B组为29%(14),而FVC分别为62%(16)和47%(13),P<0.001。B组对异丙托溴铵的反应更频繁;A组中87%在使用沙丁胺醇后改善,26%在使用异丙托溴铵后改善,而B组中68%对沙丁胺醇有反应,47%对异丙托溴铵有反应(P = 0.03)。大多数患者对沙丁胺醇有反应,但33%的患者异丙托溴铵有额外作用。FEV1对沙丁胺醇的反应随年龄下降。单纯容积反应者气流阻塞更严重,对沙丁胺醇反应更少,更可能对异丙托溴铵有反应。这些结果支持对β反应性不足的患者,尤其是气流阻塞严重的患者试用异丙托溴铵。