• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性左束支传导阻滞伴可能急性心肌梗死患者的结局。

Outcomes in patients with chronicity of left bundle-branch block with possible acute myocardial infarction.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, USA.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 2011 Apr;161(4):698-704. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.01.008.

DOI:10.1016/j.ahj.2011.01.008
PMID:21473968
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Guidelines derived from patients in clinical trials indicate that emergency department patients with likely myocardial infarction (MI) who have new left bundle-branch block (LBBB) should undergo rapid reperfusion therapy. Whether this pertains to lower risk emergency department patients with LBBB is unclear.

METHODS

A total of 401 consecutive patients with LBBB undergoing an MI rule-out protocol were included. Left bundle-branch blocks were classified as chronic; new; or, if no prior electrocardiogram (ECG) was available, as presumably new. Left bundle-branch blocks were considered concordant if there was ≥1 mm concordant ST elevation or depression. Rates of MI, peak MB values in MI patients, and 30-day mortality were compared across groups.

RESULTS

A majority of patients (64%) had new (37%) or presumably new LBBB (27%). A total of 116 patients (29%) had MI, with no significant difference in prevalence or size of MI among the 3 ECG groups. Myocardial infarction was diagnosed in 86% of patients with concordant ECG changes versus 27% of patients without concordant ECG changes (P < .01). Peak MB was >5× normal in 50% who had concordant ST changes compared to none of those who did not. Concordant ST changes were the most important predictor of MI (odds ratio 17, 95% CI 3.4-81, P < .001) and an independent predictor of mortality (odds ratio 4.3, 95% CI 1.3-15, P < .001); new or presumably new LBBB was neither.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients with possible MI with new or presumably new LBBB do not have MI. Concordant ECG changes were an important predictor of MI and death. Current guidelines regarding early reperfusion therapy for patients with LBBB should be reconsidered.

摘要

介绍

临床试验中的患者指南表明,新发左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)的疑似心肌梗死(MI)急诊科患者应接受快速再灌注治疗。但对于新发 LBBB 的低风险急诊科患者是否适用还不清楚。

方法

共纳入 401 例接受 MI 排除方案的连续 LBBB 患者。左束支传导阻滞分为慢性;新发;或如果没有之前的心电图(ECG),则假定为新发。如果有≥1mm 的 ST 段抬高或压低,则认为左束支传导阻滞为一致性改变。比较各组的 MI 发生率、MI 患者的峰值 MB 值和 30 天死亡率。

结果

大多数患者(64%)为新发(37%)或推测新发 LBBB(27%)。共有 116 例患者(29%)患有 MI,3 组 ECG 中 MI 的发生率和大小无显著差异。有一致性 ECG 改变的患者中,有 86%诊断为 MI,而没有一致性 ECG 改变的患者中,有 27%诊断为 MI(P <.01)。与无一致性 ST 改变的患者相比,有一致性 ST 改变的患者中,MB 峰值超过正常 5 倍的比例为 50%(无一致性 ST 改变的患者中为 0%)(P <.01)。一致性 ST 改变是 MI 的最重要预测因素(比值比 17,95%置信区间 3.4-81,P <.001),也是死亡率的独立预测因素(比值比 4.3,95%置信区间 1.3-15,P <.001);新发或推测新发 LBBB 均不是。

结论

大多数新发或推测新发 LBBB 的疑似 MI 患者并无 MI。一致性 ECG 改变是 MI 和死亡的重要预测因素。应重新考虑当前针对 LBBB 患者早期再灌注治疗的指南。

相似文献

1
Outcomes in patients with chronicity of left bundle-branch block with possible acute myocardial infarction.慢性左束支传导阻滞伴可能急性心肌梗死患者的结局。
Am Heart J. 2011 Apr;161(4):698-704. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.01.008.
2
Diagnosing acute myocardial infarction in patients with left bundle branch block.诊断左束支传导阻滞患者的急性心肌梗死。
Am J Cardiol. 2011 Sep 15;108(6):782-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.05.006. Epub 2011 Jul 2.
3
Lack of association between left bundle-branch block and acute myocardial infarction in symptomatic ED patients.有症状的急诊患者中左束支传导阻滞与急性心肌梗死之间无关联。
Am J Emerg Med. 2009 Oct;27(8):916-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2008.07.007.
4
Can myocardial infarction be rapidly identified in emergency department patients who have left bundle-branch block?在患有左束支传导阻滞的急诊科患者中能否快速识别出心肌梗死?
Ann Emerg Med. 2001 May;37(5):431-8. doi: 10.1067/mem.2001.114900.
5
Electrocardiographic diagnosis of myocardial infarction in patients with left bundle branch block.左束支传导阻滞患者心肌梗死的心电图诊断
Ann Emerg Med. 2000 Dec;36(6):561-5. doi: 10.1067/mem.2000.108079.
6
Comorbidity and myocardial dysfunction are the main explanations for the higher 1-year mortality in acute myocardial infarction with left bundle-branch block.合并症和心肌功能障碍是急性心肌梗死合并左束支传导阻滞患者1年死亡率较高的主要原因。
Circulation. 2004 Oct 5;110(14):1896-902. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000143136.51424.38. Epub 2004 Sep 27.
7
Utility of left bundle branch block as a diagnostic criterion for acute myocardial infarction.左束支传导阻滞作为急性心肌梗死诊断标准的效用。
Am J Cardiol. 2011 Apr 15;107(8):1111-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.12.007. Epub 2011 Feb 4.
8
Prognostic differences between different types of bundle branch block during the early phase of acute myocardial infarction: insights from the Hirulog and Early Reperfusion or Occlusion (HERO)-2 trial.急性心肌梗死早期不同类型束支传导阻滞的预后差异:来自希鲁单抗与早期再灌注或闭塞(HERO)-2试验的见解
Eur Heart J. 2006 Jan;27(1):21-8. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi622. Epub 2005 Nov 3.
9
Electrocardiographic diagnosis of evolving acute myocardial infarction in the presence of left bundle-branch block. GUSTO-1 (Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries) Investigators.左束支传导阻滞时进展期急性心肌梗死的心电图诊断。GUSTO-1(冠状动脉闭塞时链激酶和组织型纤溶酶原激活剂的全球应用)研究人员。
N Engl J Med. 1996 Feb 22;334(8):481-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199602223340801.
10
Comparison of the prognostic effect of left versus right versus no bundle branch block on presenting electrocardiogram in acute myocardial infarction patients treated with primary angioplasty in the primary angioplasty in myocardial infarction trials.在心肌梗死直接血管成形术试验中,接受直接血管成形术治疗的急性心肌梗死患者,比较左束支传导阻滞、右束支传导阻滞与无束支传导阻滞对初始心电图的预后影响。
Am J Cardiol. 2005 Aug 15;96(4):482-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.04.006.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes in ED patients with non-specific ECG findings and low high-sensitivity troponin.急诊科具有非特异性心电图表现且高敏肌钙蛋白水平低的患者的预后。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2022 Nov 17;3(6):e12844. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12844. eCollection 2022 Dec.
2
Paramedic-initiated helivac to tertiary hospital for primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a strategy for improving treatment delivery times.护理人员启动直升机转运至三级医院进行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:一种改善治疗交付时间的策略。
J Thorac Dis. 2019 May;11(5):1819-1830. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.05.45.
3
Troponin I Assay for Identification of a Significant Coronary Stenosis in Patients with Suspected Acute Myocardial Infarction and Wide QRS Complex.
肌钙蛋白I检测在疑似急性心肌梗死合并宽QRS波群患者中用于识别显著冠状动脉狭窄
PLoS One. 2016 May 5;11(5):e0154724. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154724. eCollection 2016.
4
Particularities of coronary artery disease in hypertensive patients with left bundle branch block.左束支传导阻滞的高血压患者冠状动脉疾病的特点
Maedica (Bucur). 2014 Dec;9(4):333-7.
5
Left bundle branch block and suspected myocardial infarction: does chronicity of the branch block matter?左束支传导阻滞和疑似心肌梗死:分支阻滞的慢性程度重要吗?
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2013 Jun;2(2):182-9. doi: 10.1177/2048872613483589.
6
Evolving considerations in the management of patients with left bundle branch block and suspected myocardial infarction.左束支传导阻滞伴疑似心肌梗死患者管理中不断变化的考虑因素。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Jul 10;60(2):96-105. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.02.054.