• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

辅助孵化人类胚胎:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Assisted hatching of human embryos: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

Departamento de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia da Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto da, Universidade de São Paulo, Av. dos Bandeirantes 3900, Monte Alegre, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Hum Reprod Update. 2011 Jul-Aug;17(4):438-53. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmr012. Epub 2011 Apr 7.

DOI:10.1093/humupd/dmr012
PMID:21474527
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Assisted hatching (AH) is a manipulation of zona pellucida aiming to facilitate embryo implantation.

METHODS

Systematic review and meta-analysis of medical literature was used to evaluate the effect of AH on assisted reproduction outcomes: clinical pregnancy, live birth, multiple pregnancy and miscarriage. Additional analysis was performed in these subgroups: (i) fresh embryos transferred to unselected or non-poor prognosis women; (ii) fresh embryos transferred to women with previous repeated failure; (iii) fresh embryos transferred to women of advanced age; (iv) frozen-thawed embryos transferred to unselected or non-poor prognosis women. Analyses were based on risk ratio and 95% confidence intervals (RR, 95% CIs) using Mantel-Haenszel random effects model.

RESULTS

There were 28 studies (5507 participants) included. AH was related to a trend toward increased clinical pregnancy for all participants (RR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.00-1.24), with a significant increase in subgroups 2 (RR = 1.73; 95% CI = 1.37-2.17) and 4 (RR = 1.36; 95% CI = 1.08-1.72, P< 0.01), but not for subgroups 1 and 3. For multiple pregnancy, a significant increase was observed for all participants (RR = 1.45; 95% CI = 1.11-1.90) and for subgroups 2 (RR = 2.53; 95% CI = 1.23-5.21) and 4 (RR = 3.40; 95% CI = 1.93-6.01). No significant heterogeneity was observed in subgroup analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

AH was related to increased clinical pregnancy and multiple pregnancy rates in women with previous repeated failure or frozen-thawed embryos. However, AH is unlikely to increase clinical pregnancy rates when performed in fresh embryos transferred to unselected or non-poor prognosis women or to women of advanced age. Due to the small sample evaluated by the pool of included studies, no proper conclusions could be drawn regarding miscarriage or live birth.

摘要

背景

辅助孵化(AH)是一种对透明带进行操作的方法,旨在促进胚胎着床。

方法

系统回顾和医学文献荟萃分析用于评估 AH 对辅助生殖结局的影响:临床妊娠、活产、多胎妊娠和流产。还对以下亚组进行了额外分析:(i)新鲜胚胎移植给未经选择或非预后不良的女性;(ii)新鲜胚胎移植给既往多次失败的女性;(iii)新鲜胚胎移植给高龄女性;(iv)冷冻-解冻胚胎移植给未经选择或非预后不良的女性。分析基于风险比和 95%置信区间(RR,95%CI),采用 Mantel-Haenszel 随机效应模型。

结果

共纳入 28 项研究(5507 名参与者)。AH 与所有参与者的临床妊娠率呈上升趋势相关(RR=1.11,95%CI=1.00-1.24),在亚组 2(RR=1.73;95%CI=1.37-2.17)和 4(RR=1.36;95%CI=1.08-1.72,P<0.01)中具有显著增加,但在亚组 1 和 3 中没有。对于多胎妊娠,所有参与者(RR=1.45;95%CI=1.11-1.90)和亚组 2(RR=2.53;95%CI=1.23-5.21)和 4(RR=3.40;95%CI=1.93-6.01)的多胎妊娠率均有显著增加。亚组分析未见明显异质性。

结论

AH 与既往多次失败或冷冻-解冻胚胎的女性的临床妊娠和多胎妊娠率增加有关。然而,当在新鲜胚胎移植给未经选择或非预后不良的女性或高龄女性时,AH 不太可能增加临床妊娠率。由于纳入研究的样本量较小,对于流产或活产,无法得出适当的结论。

相似文献

1
Assisted hatching of human embryos: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.辅助孵化人类胚胎:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hum Reprod Update. 2011 Jul-Aug;17(4):438-53. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmr012. Epub 2011 Apr 7.
2
Cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology.卵裂期胚胎与囊胚期胚胎在辅助生殖技术中的移植。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 19;5(5):CD002118. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002118.pub6.
3
Assisted hatching on assisted conception (in vitro fertilisation (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).辅助生殖技术(体外受精(IVF)和卵胞浆内单精子注射(ICSI))中的辅助孵化。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;12(12):CD001894. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001894.pub5.
4
Fresh versus frozen embryo transfers in assisted reproduction.辅助生殖中新鲜胚胎移植与冷冻胚胎移植的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 28;3(3):CD011184. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011184.pub2.
5
Application of seminal plasma to female genital tract prior to embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology cycles (IVF, ICSI and frozen embryo transfer).在辅助生殖技术周期(体外受精、卵胞浆内单精子注射和冻融胚胎移植)中,于胚胎移植前将精浆应用于女性生殖道。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 28;2(2):CD011809. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011809.pub2.
6
Intrauterine administration of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) for subfertile women undergoing assisted reproduction.对接受辅助生殖的不育女性进行宫内注射人绒毛膜促性腺激素(hCG)。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 20(5):CD011537. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011537.pub2.
7
Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology.辅助生殖技术中卵裂期胚胎移植与囊胚期胚胎移植的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 30(6):CD002118. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002118.pub5.
8
Assisted hatching on assisted conception (IVF & ICSI).辅助生殖(体外受精及卵胞浆内单精子注射)中的辅助孵化。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19(4):CD001894. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001894.pub2.
9
Assisted hatching on assisted conception (IVF & ICSI).辅助生殖技术(体外受精和卵胞浆内单精子注射)中的辅助孵化。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jan 25(1):CD001894. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001894.pub3.
10
Day three versus day two embryo transfer following in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection.体外受精或卵胞浆内单精子注射后第三天与第二天胚胎移植的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 14;12(12):CD004378. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004378.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Equine in vitro fertilization with frozen-thawed semen is associated with shortened pre-incubation time and modified capacitation-related changes.马用冻融精液进行体外受精与预孵育时间缩短及获能相关变化的改变有关。
Biol Reprod. 2025 May 13;112(5):867-879. doi: 10.1093/biolre/ioaf043.
2
A multicentre double-blinded randomized controlled trial on the efficacy of laser-assisted hatching in patients with repeated implantation failure undergoing IVF or ICSI.一项针对多次胚胎移植失败患者行 IVF 或 ICSI 中激光辅助孵化疗效的多中心、双盲、随机对照试验。
Hum Reprod. 2023 Oct 3;38(10):1952-1960. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dead173.
3
Laser-assisted hatching improves pregnancy outcomes in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles of cleavage-stage embryos: a large retrospective cohort study with propensity score matching.
激光辅助孵化可改善卵裂期胚胎冷冻解冻胚胎移植周期的妊娠结局:一项采用倾向评分匹配的大型回顾性队列研究。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023 Feb;40(2):417-427. doi: 10.1007/s10815-022-02711-w. Epub 2023 Jan 7.
4
Comparison of the impact of laser-assisted hatching on fresh cleavage and blastocyst embryo transfer and association with pregnancy outcomes.激光辅助孵化对新鲜卵裂期和囊胚期胚胎移植的影响比较及其与妊娠结局的关联
Turk J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Jun 27;19(2):130-137. doi: 10.4274/tjod.galenos.2022.36690.
5
The Current Practice of Assisted Hatching for Embryos in Fertility Centres: a General Survey.辅助孵化胚胎在生育中心的应用现状:一项综述。
Reprod Sci. 2022 Sep;29(9):2664-2673. doi: 10.1007/s43032-022-00931-0. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
6
Efficiency and safety of laser-assisted hatching on vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer cycles: a prospective control trial.玻璃化冷冻-解冻囊胚移植周期中激光辅助孵化的效率和安全性:一项前瞻性对照试验。
Lasers Med Sci. 2022 Apr;37(3):1931-1942. doi: 10.1007/s10103-021-03453-4. Epub 2021 Nov 20.
7
The effect of chemical treatment of the sheep embryo zona pellucida on the ability of blastocysts to hatch after vitrification and warming.绵羊胚胎透明带的化学处理对玻璃化冷冻和解冻后囊胚孵化能力的影响。
Vet Med Sci. 2022 Jan;8(1):405-410. doi: 10.1002/vms3.632. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
8
Laser-assisted hatching in lower grade cleavage stage embryos improves blastocyst formation: results from a retrospective study.激光辅助孵化在低评分卵裂期胚胎中提高囊胚形成率:一项回顾性研究的结果。
J Ovarian Res. 2021 Jul 15;14(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s13048-021-00844-7.
9
A comparison of the clinical effects of thinning and drilling on laser-assisted hatching.比较削薄与钻孔对激光辅助孵化的临床效果。
Lasers Med Sci. 2022 Feb;37(1):1-9. doi: 10.1007/s10103-020-03230-9. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
10
Controlled hatching at the prescribed site using femtosecond laser for zona pellucida drilling at the early blastocyst stage.使用飞秒激光在早期囊胚阶段对透明带进行定点孵化。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021 Feb;38(2):517-529. doi: 10.1007/s10815-020-01998-x. Epub 2020 Nov 17.