Suppr超能文献

抗精神病药治疗精神分裂症:获益与风险。

Antipsychotic polypharmacy in schizophrenia: benefits and risks.

机构信息

Division of Experimental Medicine,Centre for Mental Health, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Campus, London, UK.

出版信息

CNS Drugs. 2011 May;25(5):383-99. doi: 10.2165/11587810-000000000-00000.

Abstract

Antipsychotic polypharmacy refers to the co-prescription of more than one antipsychotic drug for an individual patient. Surveys of prescribing in psychiatric services internationally have identified the relatively frequent and consistent use of combined antipsychotics, usually for people with established schizophrenia, with a prevalence of up to 50% in some clinical settings. A common reason for prescribing more than one antipsychotic is to gain a greater or more rapid therapeutic response than has been achieved with antipsychotic monotherapy. However, the evidence on the risks and benefits for such a strategy is equivocal, and not generally considered adequate to warrant a recommendation for its use in routine clinical practice in psychiatry. Combined antipsychotics are a major contributor to high-dose prescribing, associated with an increased adverse effect burden, and of limited value in helping to establish the optimum maintenance regimen for a patient. The relatively widespread use of antipsychotic polypharmacy identified in cross-sectional surveys reflects not only the addition of a second antipsychotic to boost therapeutic response, but also the use of as-required antipsychotic medication (mainly to treat disturbed behaviour), gradual cross-titration while switching from one antipsychotic to another, and augmentation of clozapine with a second antipsychotic where the illness has failed to respond adequately to an optimized trial of clozapine. This review addresses the clinical trial data and other evidence for each of these pharmacological approaches. Also reviewed are examples of systematic, practice-based interventions designed to reduce the prevalence of antipsychotic polypharmacy, most of which have met with only modest success. Guidelines generally agree that if combined antipsychotics are prescribed to treat refractory psychotic illness, this should be after other, evidence-based, pharmacological treatments such as clozapine have been exhausted. Further, their prescription for each patient should be in the context of an individual trial, with monitoring of the clinical response and adverse effects, and appropriate physical health monitoring.

摘要

抗精神病药联合用药是指为一位患者同时开具两种或以上的抗精神病药物。国际精神科服务的处方调查已经确定了联合使用抗精神病药物的相对频繁和一致的情况,通常用于已确诊的精神分裂症患者,在某些临床环境中的患病率高达 50%。开具两种或以上抗精神病药物的常见原因是为了获得比单一抗精神病药物治疗更大或更快的治疗反应。然而,这种策略的风险和益处的证据是模棱两可的,通常不足以证明其在精神科常规临床实践中使用的合理性。联合抗精神病药物是高剂量处方的主要原因,与不良影响负担增加有关,并且在帮助确定患者的最佳维持治疗方案方面价值有限。横断面调查中发现的抗精神病药联合用药的相对广泛使用不仅反映了添加第二种抗精神病药物以增强治疗反应,还反映了按需使用抗精神病药物(主要用于治疗紊乱行为)、在从一种抗精神病药物切换到另一种药物时逐渐交叉滴定,以及在氯氮平治疗反应不足时,用第二种抗精神病药物增强氯氮平的治疗。这篇综述涉及了这些药物治疗方法的临床试验数据和其他证据。还回顾了旨在降低抗精神病药联合用药流行率的系统的、基于实践的干预措施的实例,其中大多数干预措施仅取得了适度的成功。指南普遍认为,如果联合抗精神病药物用于治疗难治性精神病,应在其他基于证据的药物治疗(如氯氮平)用尽后才使用。此外,应为每位患者制定个体化的临床试验,监测临床反应和不良反应,并进行适当的身体健康监测。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验