• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在听众对说话者体型、男性化程度和吸引力的评估中,语音基频或共振峰的优先级。

The prioritization of voice fundamental frequency or formants in listeners' assessments of speaker size, masculinity, and attractiveness.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, The University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Apr;129(4):2201-12. doi: 10.1121/1.3552866.

DOI:10.1121/1.3552866
PMID:21476675
Abstract

Key features of the voice--fundamental frequency (F(0)) and formant frequencies (Fn)--can vary extensively among individuals. Some of this variation might cue fitness-related, biosocial dimensions of speakers. Three experiments tested the independent, joint and relative effects of F(0) and Fn on listeners' assessments of the body size, masculinity (or femininity), and attractiveness of male and female speakers. Experiment 1 replicated previous findings concerning the joint and independent effects of F(0) and Fn on these assessments. Experiment 2 established frequency discrimination thresholds (or just-noticeable differences, JND's) for both vocal features to use in subsequent tests of their relative salience. JND's for F(0) and Fn were consistent in the range of 5%-6% for each sex. Experiment 3 put the two voice features in conflict by equally discriminable amounts and found that listeners consistently tracked Fn over F(0) in rating all three dimensions. Several non-exclusive possibilities for this outcome are considered, including that voice Fn provides more reliable cues to one or more dimensions and that listeners' assessments of the different dimensions are partially interdependent. Results highlight the value of first establishing JND's for discrimination of specific features of natural voices in future work examining their effects on voice-based social judgments.

摘要

声音的主要特征——基频 (F(0)) 和共振峰频率 (Fn)——在个体之间可能有很大的差异。这种变化可能提示了与说话者健康相关的、生物社会维度的特征。三个实验分别测试了 F(0)和 Fn 对听众对男性和女性说话者的体型、男性化 (或女性化) 和吸引力的评估的独立、联合和相对影响。实验 1 复制了之前关于 F(0)和 Fn 对这些评估的联合和独立影响的发现。实验 2 为随后测试它们的相对显著性建立了 F(0)和 Fn 的频率辨别阈值(或仅可察觉差异,JND)。对于每个性别,F(0)和 Fn 的 JND 在 5%-6%的范围内是一致的。实验 3 通过相等的可辨别量使这两个声音特征产生冲突,并发现听众在评价所有三个维度时,始终将 Fn 追踪到 F(0)之上。对于这种结果,有几种非排他性的可能性,包括语音 Fn 为一个或多个维度提供更可靠的线索,以及听众对不同维度的评估部分相互依赖。结果突出了在未来研究中,首先确定自然声音特定特征的辨别 JND 的价值,以检查它们对基于声音的社会判断的影响。

相似文献

1
The prioritization of voice fundamental frequency or formants in listeners' assessments of speaker size, masculinity, and attractiveness.在听众对说话者体型、男性化程度和吸引力的评估中,语音基频或共振峰的优先级。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Apr;129(4):2201-12. doi: 10.1121/1.3552866.
2
What makes a voice masculine: physiological and acoustical correlates of women's ratings of men's vocal masculinity.是什么让声音具有男性特质:女性对男性声音男性特质评分的生理和声学关联
Horm Behav. 2014 Sep;66(4):569-76. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2014.08.006. Epub 2014 Aug 27.
3
Perception of pitch location within a speaker's range: fundamental frequency, voice quality and speaker sex.在说话者的音域内感知音高位置:基频、嗓音质量和说话者性别。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Aug;132(2):1100-12. doi: 10.1121/1.4714351.
4
The effect of perceptual training on inexperienced listeners' judgments of dysphonic voice.感知训练对无经验听众判断嗓音障碍语音的影响。
J Voice. 2006 Dec;20(4):527-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2005.08.007. Epub 2005 Dec 1.
5
Differences between self-assessment and external rating of voice with regard to sex characteristics, age, and attractiveness.在声音的性别特征、年龄和吸引力方面,自我评估与外部评价之间的差异。
J Voice. 2014 Jan;28(1):128.e11-128.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.07.007. Epub 2013 Nov 8.
6
Lifting the curtain on the Wizard of Oz: biased voice-based impressions of speaker size.揭开《绿野仙踪》的面纱:基于声音的对说话者体型的偏见性印象。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007 Oct;33(5):1208-19. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.5.1208.
7
Gender identity is indexed and perceived in speech.性别认同在言语中被标记和感知。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 20;13(12):e0209226. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209226. eCollection 2018.
8
Do Voice-Based Judgments of Socially Relevant Speaker Traits Differ Across Speech Types?基于语音的对与社会相关的说话者特征的判断是否因语音类型而异?
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2022 Oct 17;65(10):3674-3694. doi: 10.1044/2022_JSLHR-21-00690. Epub 2022 Sep 27.
9
Low is large: spatial location and pitch interact in voice-based body size estimation.低音显大:空间位置与音高在基于声音的体型估计中相互作用。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 May;79(4):1239-1251. doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1273-6.
10
Acoustic Predictors of Gender Attribution, Masculinity-Femininity, and Vocal Naturalness Ratings Amongst Transgender and Cisgender Speakers.跨性别者和顺性别者中性别归因、男性气质-女性气质及嗓音自然度评分的声学预测因素
J Voice. 2020 Mar;34(2):300.e11-300.e26. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.10.002. Epub 2018 Nov 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving Voice Spoofing Detection Through Extensive Analysis of Multicepstral Feature Reduction.通过对多倒谱特征约简的广泛分析改进语音欺骗检测
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Aug 5;25(15):4821. doi: 10.3390/s25154821.
2
Formant analysis of vertebrate vocalizations: achievements, pitfalls, and promises.脊椎动物发声的共振峰分析:成就、陷阱与前景。
BMC Biol. 2025 Apr 7;23(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12915-025-02188-w.
3
Comparing accuracy in voice-based assessments of biological speaker traits across speech types.比较不同语音类型下基于语音的生物说话人特征评估的准确性。
Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 27;13(1):22989. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-49596-y.
4
Effects of speech therapy for transgender women: A systematic review.言语治疗对跨性别女性的影响:一项系统评价。
Int J Transgend Health. 2021 May 12;22(4):360-380. doi: 10.1080/26895269.2021.1915224. eCollection 2021.
5
Sex-biased sound symbolism in French first names.法语人名中的性别偏向性语音象征
Evol Hum Sci. 2019 Jul 12;1:e7. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2019.7. eCollection 2019.
6
An Experimental Analysis on Multicepstral Projection Representation Strategies for Dysphonia Detection.多倒谱投影表示策略在嗓音障碍检测中的实验分析。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 May 30;23(11):5196. doi: 10.3390/s23115196.
7
Hearing, touching, and multisensory integration during mate choice.听觉、触觉和多感官整合在配偶选择中的作用。
Front Neural Circuits. 2022 Sep 20;16:943888. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2022.943888. eCollection 2022.
8
Set the tone: Trustworthy and dominant novel voices classification using explicit judgement and machine learning techniques.设定基调:使用明确判断和机器学习技术对值得信赖且具有主导地位的新颖声音进行分类。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 29;17(6):e0267432. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267432. eCollection 2022.
9
Vocal Attractiveness Matters: Social Preferences in Cooperative Behavior.嗓音吸引力很重要:合作行为中的社会偏好
Front Psychol. 2022 May 26;13:877530. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.877530. eCollection 2022.
10
Nonlinear vocal phenomena affect human perceptions of distress, size and dominance in puppy whines.小狗哀鸣声中的非线性发声现象会影响人类对其痛苦、体型和支配地位的感知。
Proc Biol Sci. 2022 Apr 27;289(1973):20220429. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2022.0429.