Oncogenetic and Molecular Angiogenetic Laboratory, Hospital Pitié-Salpêtrière AP-HP, Paris, France.
Clin Genet. 2012 Jan;81(1):38-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2011.01676.x. Epub 2011 May 4.
Two main colorectal polyposis syndromes have been described, familial adenomatous polyposis and MUTYH-associated polyposis syndromes. Some polyposis remains unexplained: 20% of adenomatous polyposis and serrated polyposis. The aim of this study was to evaluate in a cohort of patients with unexplained polyposis whether a genetic defect could be detected. Individuals presenting polyposis with more than 40 adenomas or more than 20 serrated polyps (hyperplastic, sessile serrated and mixed), without causative mutation identified, were included. Complementary explorations on APC or MUTYH were performed: search for APC mosaicism, splicing-affecting mutations, large genomic rearrangement of MUTYH. Four genes of Wnt pathway (AXIN2, PPP2R1B, WIF1, SFRP1) and two genes of transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) pathway (SMAD4, BMPR1A) were screened for germline mutation. Twenty-five patients had an unexplained adenomatous polyposis (familial or sporadic). Five pathogenic mutations were found: four in APC gene (with one case of mosaicism) and one in BMPR1A gene. The exploration of APC mosaicism was better performed from adenoma DNA with high-resolution melting. The screening of the candidate genes did not find any causative mutation. Thirteen individuals had an unexplained serrated polyposis and a frameshift on SMAD4 gene was identified. All mutations were identified in familial cases of polyposis. After new pathological examination, both BMPR1A and SMAD4 cases were found to be associated with a juvenile polyposis while the polyposis was initially described as adenomatous or undetermined. In 17% (6/38) of the patients the causative mutation of the polyposis was identified. Genetic causes were heterogeneous. Sporadic polyposis patients must be considered as potential APC mosaicism. The histological classification of polyposis is strongly important in direct genetic exploration.
两种主要的结直肠息肉综合征已被描述,家族性腺瘤性息肉病和 MUTYH 相关息肉病综合征。一些息肉仍然无法解释:20%的腺瘤性息肉和锯齿状息肉。本研究的目的是评估在一组不明原因息肉病患者中是否可以检测到遗传缺陷。存在超过 40 个腺瘤或超过 20 个锯齿状息肉(增生性、无蒂锯齿状和混合性)的息肉病患者,且未发现致病突变,将其纳入研究。对 APC 或 MUTYH 进行补充探索:检测 APC 镶嵌现象、影响剪接的突变、MUTYH 的大片段基因组重排。对 Wnt 通路的四个基因(AXIN2、PPP2R1B、WIF1、SFRP1)和 TGF-β 通路的两个基因(SMAD4、BMPR1A)进行种系突变筛查。25 例患者存在不明原因的腺瘤性息肉(家族性或散发性)。发现 5 种致病性突变:APC 基因 4 种(伴 1 例镶嵌现象),BMPR1A 基因 1 种。APC 镶嵌现象的探索可通过高分辨率熔解从腺瘤 DNA 中更好地进行。候选基因的筛查未发现任何致病突变。13 例患者存在不明原因的锯齿状息肉,发现 SMAD4 基因发生框移突变。所有突变均在家族性息肉病中发现。新的病理检查后,发现 BMPR1A 和 SMAD4 病例均与少年息肉病有关,而最初描述的息肉为腺瘤性或未确定。在 38 例患者中的 17%(6/38)确定了息肉的致病突变。遗传病因具有异质性。散发性息肉病患者必须被视为潜在的 APC 镶嵌现象。息肉病的组织学分类在直接遗传探索中具有重要意义。