Suppr超能文献

三重口服固定剂量糖尿病复方片剂与胰岛素加二甲双胍治疗 2 型糖尿病的疗效验证研究(TrIED 研究-II)。

Triple oral fixed-dose diabetes polypill versus insulin plus metformin efficacy demonstration study in the treatment of advanced type 2 diabetes (TrIED study-II).

机构信息

Southside Endocrinology, University of Alabama Medical School, 1020 26th Street South, Birmingham, AL 35205, USA.

出版信息

Diabetes Obes Metab. 2011 Sep;13(9):800-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2011.01408.x.

Abstract

AIM

To compare the efficacy of a fixed-dose triple oral diabetes polypill containing 1 or 2 mg glimepiride, 500 mg sustained-release metformin, and 15 mg pioglitazone (GMP) administered once daily with human insulin 70/30 mix and 500 mg sustained-release metformin administered twice daily (IM) in insulin-naÏve subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled [haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) over 8.0%] on a combination of glimepiride and metformin.

METHODS

One hundred and one subjects were randomized to GMP or IM regimens for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was the change in HbA1c and secondary outcomes were changes in fasting plasma, and postprandial plasma glucoses and the number of patients achieving a drop in HbA1c of over 1%. Other secondary outcomes were changes in the lipid profile, C-peptide level, body weight as well as physician assessments of efficacy and patient assessment of tolerability.

RESULTS

The primary outcome of a change in HbA1c showed a trend towards a lower HbA1c with GMP therapy (-1.33% vs. -0.83%; p = 0.059). The number of subjects achieving a decrease in HbA1c of greater than 1.0% was significantly greater in the GMP therapy (72.5% vs. 22%; p = 0.0001). Both regimens equally and significantly reduced fasting and postprandial glucose levels (p = 0.05). Weight gain was nonsignificantly greater with IM (2.69 vs. 0.92 kg; p = 0.223). Investigator assessment of efficacy was significantly better with GMP (p = 0.001) as was tolerability as assessed by patients (p = 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

When compared with suboptimally titrated IM there was a trend towards a lower HbA1c with GMP and significantly more GMP subjects obtained an HbA1c under 7%. Global assessments by investigators and subjects showed both a greater efficacy and tolerability with GMP.

摘要

目的

比较每日一次服用固定剂量的包含 1 或 2 毫克格列美脲、500 毫克缓释二甲双胍和 15 毫克吡格列酮的三药口服糖尿病复方制剂(GMP)与每日两次服用人胰岛素 70/30 混合制剂和 500 毫克缓释二甲双胍(IM)在血糖控制不佳的(糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)>8.0%)的 2 型糖尿病患者中的疗效。

方法

101 例患者被随机分配至 GMP 或 IM 治疗组,疗程 12 周。主要疗效终点为 HbA1c 的变化,次要疗效终点为空腹和餐后血浆血糖的变化以及 HbA1c 下降超过 1%的患者例数。其他次要疗效终点为血脂谱、C 肽水平、体重以及医生评估的疗效和患者评估的耐受性的变化。

结果

主要疗效终点 HbA1c 的变化显示 GMP 治疗有降低 HbA1c 的趋势(-1.33% vs. -0.83%;p = 0.059)。在 GMP 治疗组中,HbA1c 下降超过 1.0%的患者比例显著更高(72.5% vs. 22%;p = 0.0001)。两种治疗方案均能显著降低空腹和餐后血糖水平(p = 0.05)。IM 组体重增加更显著(2.69 千克 vs. 0.92 千克;p = 0.223)。GMP 治疗的疗效评估显著优于 IM(p = 0.001),患者对 GMP 的耐受性评估也显著优于 IM(p = 0.0001)。

结论

与剂量调整欠佳的 IM 相比,GMP 治疗有降低 HbA1c 的趋势,且有更多的 GMP 治疗组患者 HbA1c <7%。研究者和患者的综合评估均显示 GMP 具有更好的疗效和耐受性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验