Orthodontic Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Eur J Orthod. 2012 Apr;34(2):176-81. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq179. Epub 2011 Apr 8.
This prospective study investigated the difference in clinical efficiency between Damon™ 3 self-ligating brackets (SLB) compared with Mini Diamond conventional ligating brackets (CLBs) during tooth alignment in straightwire fixed appliance therapy. Twenty-nine patients (10 males and 19 females), aged between 14 and 30 years, were randomly divided into two groups: 14 patients received the SLB and 15 received the CLB. Upper arch impressions were taken for pre-treatment records (T(0)). A transpalatal arch was soldered to both maxillary first molar bands prior to extraction of the maxillary first premolars, followed by straightwire fixed appliances (0.022 × 0.028 inch). A 0.014 inch nickel titanium (NiTi) wire was used as the levelling and aligning archwire. Four monthly reviews were undertaken and impressions of the upper arch were taken at each appointment (T(1), T(2), T(3), and T(4)). Displacements of the teeth were determined using Little's irregularity index (LII). Data were analysed using the Mann-Whitney U-test. In the aligning stage, the CLB group showed significantly faster alignment of the teeth compared with the SLB group at the T(1)-T(2) interval (P < 0.05). However, there were no differences at T(2)-T(3), and T(3)-T(4) for either group (P > 0.05). The CLB group showed 98 per cent crowding alleviation compared with 67 per cent for the SLB after 4 months of alignment and levelling. Mini Diamond brackets aligned the teeth faster than Damon™ 3 but only during the first month. There was no difference in efficacy between the two groups in the later 3 weeks. Alleviation of crowding was faster with CLB than with SLB.
本前瞻性研究调查了 Damon™ 3 自锁托槽 (SLB) 与 Mini Diamond 传统结扎托槽 (CLB) 在直丝弓固定矫治器治疗中牙齿排齐阶段的临床疗效差异。29 名患者(10 名男性,19 名女性),年龄 14 至 30 岁,随机分为两组:14 名患者使用 SLB,15 名患者使用 CLB。在上颌弓取初诊记录(T(0))印模。在上颌第一磨牙带环上焊接一个横腭杆,然后拔除上颌第一前磨牙,接着使用直丝弓固定矫治器(0.022×0.028 英寸)。使用 0.014 英寸镍钛(NiTi)丝作为整平弓丝。每 4 个月复查一次,每次就诊时(T(1)、T(2)、T(3)和 T(4))都在上颌取印模。使用 Little 不调指数(LII)确定牙齿的位移。使用 Mann-Whitney U 检验对数据进行分析。在排齐阶段,CLB 组在 T(1)-T(2)间隔的牙齿排齐速度明显快于 SLB 组(P<0.05)。然而,两组在 T(2)-T(3)和 T(3)-T(4)阶段都没有差异(P>0.05)。在 4 个月的排齐和整平后,CLB 组的拥挤解除率为 98%,而 SLB 组为 67%。Mini Diamond 托槽排齐牙齿的速度比 Damon™ 3 快,但仅在第一个月。在随后的 3 周内,两组之间的疗效没有差异。CLB 比 SLB 更快地缓解拥挤。