Toxicological Centre, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk-Antwerp, Belgium.
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2011 Jul;400(9):3073-83. doi: 10.1007/s00216-011-4966-7. Epub 2011 Apr 10.
A new method was developed and optimized for the detection of major "novel" brominated flame retardants (NBFRs), which included decabromodiphenyl ethane (DBDPE), 1,2-bis(2,4,6-tribromophenoxy) ethane (BTBPE), tetrabromobisphenol A-bis(2,3-dibromopropylether) (TBBPA-DBPE), 2-ethylhexyl-2,3,4,5-tetrabromobenzoate (TBB), bis(2-ethylhexyl)-3,4,5,6-tetrabromophthalate (TBPH) and hexachlorocyclopentadienyl-dibromocyclooctane (HCDBCO). Several solid phase sorbents were tested, and finally, a two-step cleanup procedure was established. The first step on activated silica was used to fractionate the dust extracts, while the second step on acidified silica (silica gel impregnated with sulphuric acid 44% w/w) and on Florisil(®), respectively, was essential for advanced cleanup. High recoveries for NBFRs (range, 75-94%) were achieved. Analysis was performed by gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry in electron capture negative ionization using a DB-5ms (15 m × 0.25 mm × 0.1 μm) capillary column. Quantification of DBDPE, BTBPE and TBBPA-DBPE was based on ion m/z 79, while characteristic ions were used for quantification of TBB (m/z 359), HCDBCO (m/z 310) and TBPH (m/z 384). The method provided good repeatability; within- and between-day precision were ≤14% for all NBFRs. Method limits of quantification ranged between 1 and 20 ng g(-1); dust and NBFRs were not detected in blanks. The method was further applied to indoor dust (n = 21) collected from e-waste facilities in Thailand. Except for HCDBCO, all NBFRs were detected in the e-waste dust with concentrations up to 44,000 and 22,600 ng g(-1) DBDPE and BTBPE, respectively. The dust profile was dominated by DBDPE (50%) > BTBPE (45%) > TBBPA-DBPE (3%) > TBPH (1.9%) > TBB (0.1%). Significant correlations (p < 0.05) were found between the concentrations of BTBPE and BDE 183 or BDE 197 on the one hand, between TBPH and BDE 47 or BDE 99, and between DBDPE and BDE 209, on the other hand. Concentrations of TBB were not positively correlated with TBPH, which suggests different emission sources.
开发并优化了一种用于检测主要“新型”溴化阻燃剂(NBFRs)的新方法,其中包括十溴二苯乙烷(DBDPE)、1,2-双(2,4,6-三溴苯氧基)乙烷(BTBPE)、四溴双酚 A-双(2,3-二溴丙基醚)(TBBPA-DBPE)、2-乙基己基-2,3,4,5-四溴苯甲酸酯(TBB)、双(2-乙基己基)-3,4,5,6-四溴邻苯二甲酸酯(TBPH)和六氯环戊二烯基二溴环辛烷(HCDBCO)。测试了几种固相吸附剂,最终建立了两步净化程序。第一步在活性硅胶上进行,用于分馏粉尘提取物,第二步在酸化硅胶(硅胶浸渍硫酸 44%w/w)和 Florisil(®)上进行,对于进一步的净化是必不可少的。NBFRs 的回收率较高(范围为 75-94%)。采用气相色谱-质谱联用仪在电子俘获负电离模式下,使用 DB-5ms(15 m×0.25 mm×0.1 μm)毛细管柱进行分析。DBDPE、BTBPE 和 TBBPA-DBPE 的定量基于离子 m/z 79,而 TBB(m/z 359)、HCDBCO(m/z 310)和 TBPH(m/z 384)的特征离子用于定量。该方法具有良好的重现性;所有 NBFRs 的日内和日间精密度均≤14%。方法检出限范围为 1 至 20 ng g(-1);空白样品中未检出粉尘和 NBFRs。该方法进一步应用于泰国电子废物设施采集的室内粉尘(n=21)。除 HCDBCO 外,所有 NBFRs 均在电子废物粉尘中检出,浓度高达 44,000 和 22,600 ng g(-1)的 DBDPE 和 BTBPE。粉尘特征以 DBDPE(50%)>BTBPE(45%)>TBBPA-DBPE(3%)>TBPH(1.9%)>TBB(0.1%)为主。BTBPE 与 BDE 183 或 BDE 197 之间,TBPH 与 BDE 47 或 BDE 99 之间,DBDPE 与 BDE 209 之间存在显著相关性(p<0.05)。TBB 的浓度与 TBPH 之间没有正相关,这表明存在不同的排放源。