• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国安格利亚地区妇科癌症患者生存率的提高:这是否是护理集中化和多学科管理的效果?

Improvements in survival of gynaecological cancer in the Anglia region of England: are these an effect of centralisation of care and use of multidisciplinary management?

机构信息

Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, UK.

出版信息

BJOG. 2012 Jan;119(2):160-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.02961.x. Epub 2011 Apr 12.

DOI:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.02961.x
PMID:21481154
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Our hypothesis is that the adoption of Department of Health (DH) guidance has led to an improvement in outcome in gynaecological cancer survival.

SETTING

In 1999 the DH in England introduced the Improving Outcomes in Gynaecological Cancer guidance, advising case management by multidisciplinary teams with surgical concentration in specialist hospitals. This guidance was rapidly adopted in the East of England, with a population of 2.5 million.

POPULATION

The population of the Anglia Cancer Network was approximately 2.3 million.

METHODS

From 1996 to 2003, details of 3406 cases of gynaecological cancer were identified in the Anglia region of England. Survival analysis was performed by Cox proportional hazards regression, relative to cases diagnosed in 1996.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Primary endpoint was survival.

RESULTS

The survival rates for cases diagnosed between 1996 and 1999 were broadly the same across the time period, with a marked improvement taking place in 2000, and continuing to 2003 (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.64-0.79, comparing 2000-03 with 1996-99 diagnoses), for all gynaecological sites combined. Adjustment for treatments or method of case follow-up did not attenuate these improvements. There was a concurrent change towards major surgery being performed in specialist centres from 2000.

CONCLUSIONS

The adoption of the 1999 guidance on gynaecological cancer, which included multidisciplinary case management and centralisation of surgery, resulted in a marked step-change improvement in survival of gynaecological cancer in an area of eastern England in 2000.

摘要

目的

我们的假设是,采用卫生部(DH)的指导意见导致妇科癌症患者的生存结局得到改善。

背景

1999 年,英国卫生部(DH)在英格兰推出了改善妇科癌症治疗效果的指导意见,建议通过多学科团队对病例进行管理,并将手术集中在专科医院进行。该指导意见在拥有 250 万人口的英格兰东部迅速得到采用。

人群

东安格利亚癌症网络的人口约为 230 万。

方法

1996 年至 2003 年,在英格兰东安格利亚地区确定了 3406 例妇科癌症病例。采用 Cox 比例风险回归法对生存情况进行分析,以 1996 年确诊的病例为参照。

主要观察指标

主要终点是生存。

结果

1996 年至 1999 年期间确诊的病例的生存率在整个时间段内大致相同,2000 年开始出现显著改善,并持续到 2003 年(2000-03 年与 1996-99 年诊断病例相比,HR 为 0.71,95%CI 为 0.64-0.79),所有妇科部位的病例均如此。对治疗方法或病例随访方法进行调整并不能减弱这些改善。2000 年开始,主要手术也同时向专科医院转移。

结论

2000 年,在英国东部地区,对妇科癌症的治疗指南(包括多学科病例管理和手术集中)的采用,导致妇科癌症患者的生存率发生了显著的阶段性改善。

相似文献

1
Improvements in survival of gynaecological cancer in the Anglia region of England: are these an effect of centralisation of care and use of multidisciplinary management?英国安格利亚地区妇科癌症患者生存率的提高:这是否是护理集中化和多学科管理的效果?
BJOG. 2012 Jan;119(2):160-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.02961.x. Epub 2011 Apr 12.
2
Improvements in survival of gynaecological cancer in the Anglia region of England: are these all real?英格兰东安格利亚地区妇科癌症患者生存率的提高:这些都是真实的吗?
BJOG. 2012 May;119(6):768-9; author reply 769. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03299.x.
3
The surgical management of women with ovarian cancer in the south west of England.英格兰西南部卵巢癌女性患者的外科治疗
Br J Cancer. 2001 Dec 14;85(12):1824-30. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.2001.2196.
4
The impact of improving outcomes guidance on surgical management of vulval squamous cell cancer in southwest England (1997-2002).改善结局指南对英格兰西南部外阴鳞状细胞癌手术治疗的影响(1997 - 2002年)
BJOG. 2007 Apr;114(4):391-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01181.x.
5
Incidence, pathology and outcome of gynaecological cancer in patients under the age of 21 years in South-west England 1995-2004: comparison of data from regional, national and international registries.
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008 Oct;28(7):722-7. doi: 10.1080/01443610802463462.
6
Outcomes following hysterectomy or endometrial ablation for heavy menstrual bleeding: retrospective analysis of hospital episode statistics in Scotland.子宫切除术或子宫内膜消融术治疗月经过多的结果:苏格兰医院病例统计的回顾性分析。
BJOG. 2011 Sep;118(10):1171-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.03011.x. Epub 2011 May 31.
7
Clinical decision-making in a multidisciplinary gynaecological cancer team: a qualitative study.多学科妇科癌症团队中的临床决策制定:一项定性研究
BJOG. 2009 Mar;116(4):511-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.02066.x.
8
National guidance on gynaecological cancer management: an audit of gynaecological cancer services and management in the South East of England.妇科癌症管理国家指南:对英格兰东南部妇科癌症服务与管理的一项审计
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2003;24(3-4):246-50.
9
Influence of department volume on cancer survival for gynaecological cancers--a population-based study in Tyrol, Austria.
Gynecol Oncol. 2006 Nov;103(2):527-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.03.044. Epub 2006 May 26.
10
Gynaecological cancers in Umbria (Italy): trends of incidence, mortality and survival, 1978-1998.意大利翁布里亚地区的妇科癌症:1978 - 1998年发病率、死亡率及生存率趋势
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004 Jul 15;115(1):59-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2003.11.026.

引用本文的文献

1
The Relevance of Gynecologic Oncologists to Provide High-Quality of Care to Women with Gynecological Cancer.妇科肿瘤学家为妇科癌症患者提供高质量护理的相关性。
Front Oncol. 2016 Jan 14;5:308. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2015.00308. eCollection 2015.
2
The optimal organization of gynecologic oncology services: a systematic review.妇科肿瘤服务的优化组织:一项系统综述
Curr Oncol. 2015 Aug;22(4):e282-93. doi: 10.3747/co.22.2482.
3
Minimum volume standards in German hospitals: do they get along with procedure centralization? A retrospective longitudinal data analysis.
德国医院的最小容量标准:它们与手术集中化兼容吗?一项回顾性纵向数据分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Jul 22;15:279. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0944-7.
4
The proliferation of multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTMs): how can radiology departments continue to support them all?多学科团队会议(MDTMs)的激增:放射科部门如何继续支持所有这些会议?
Eur Radiol. 2015 Dec;25(12):3679-84. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3760-x. Epub 2015 May 1.
5
What is the role of the multidisciplinary team in the management of urinary incontinence?多学科团队在尿失禁管理中扮演着什么角色?
Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Jun;26(6):791-3. doi: 10.1007/s00192-014-2579-3. Epub 2014 Nov 22.
6
Teamwork in skull base surgery: An avenue for improvement in patient care.颅底手术中的团队合作:改善患者护理的途径。
Surg Neurol Int. 2013 Mar 25;4:36. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.109527. Print 2013.