• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

即刻负载种植体在拔牙窝与愈合后位点的对比回顾性研究:上颌 6-7 年后的结果。

A comparative retrospective study of immediately loaded implants in postextraction sites versus healed sites: results after 6 to 7 years in the maxilla.

机构信息

University of Verona, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinic, Verona, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 Mar-Apr;26(2):373-84.

PMID:21483891
Abstract

PURPOSE

Immediate loading has become an emerging technique because it has been shown to be a successful, time-saving procedure. Recently, immediate loading has been performed simultaneously with implant placement into fresh extraction sockets; excellent results have been achieved, but few reports are available with a long-term follow-up. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the difference in success rates in the maxilla between postextraction implants and implants placed in healed sites, both of which were immediately loaded, after a long-term follow-up.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between October 2001 and February 2003, 239 implants were inserted in 81 consecutively operated patients and immediately loaded; 138 implants were placed in fresh postextraction sites (57.7%) and 101 implants were placed in healed sites (42.3%). Two different implant systems were used in this study. Each implant was loaded within 72 hours of placement (60.3% at the time of surgery, 6.3% after 24 hours, 30.1% after 48 hours, and 3.3% after 72 hours). Preestablished success criteria were used to evaluate the success rate of the implants.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 6.7 years (range: 6.0 to 7.3 years). Only 8 of the 239 implants failed, for an overall success rate of 96.6%. Six of the failed implants were inserted in postextraction sites, and 2 had been placed in healed sites; the success rates were 95.7% and 98.0%, respectively. Statistical analysis revealed no significant differences between postextraction and healed sites.

CONCLUSIONS

Immediate loading of immediate postextraction sites results in an implant success rate that is broadly comparable to that seen for implants placed in healed sites. Moreover, this procedure can provide predictable and favorable results in many different clinical conditions and for a long term.

摘要

目的

即刻负载已成为一种新兴技术,因为它已被证明是一种成功且省时的方法。最近,即刻负载已与植入物同时在新鲜拔牙窝中进行;已取得了极好的结果,但只有少数报告具有长期随访。本研究的目的是评估在长期随访后,即刻负载的即刻拔牙窝内种植体和愈合后种植体在上颌骨中的成功率差异。

材料与方法

2001 年 10 月至 2003 年 2 月期间,81 例连续手术患者共植入 239 个种植体并即刻负载;其中 138 个种植体置于新鲜拔牙窝内(57.7%),101 个种植体置于愈合后牙槽窝内(42.3%)。本研究使用了两种不同的种植系统。每个种植体在植入后 72 小时内负载(60.3%在手术时,6.3%在 24 小时后,30.1%在 48 小时后,3.3%在 72 小时后)。使用预先确定的成功标准评估种植体的成功率。

结果

平均随访时间为 6.7 年(范围:6.0 至 7.3 年)。239 个种植体中仅有 8 个失败,总成功率为 96.6%。6 个失败的种植体位于拔牙窝内,2 个位于愈合后牙槽窝内;成功率分别为 95.7%和 98.0%。统计学分析显示拔牙窝内和愈合后牙槽窝内的成功率无显著差异。

结论

即刻负载即刻拔牙窝内的种植体可获得与愈合后牙槽窝内种植体相当的成功率。此外,这种方法在许多不同的临床情况下可以提供可预测且良好的长期效果。

相似文献

1
A comparative retrospective study of immediately loaded implants in postextraction sites versus healed sites: results after 6 to 7 years in the maxilla.即刻负载种植体在拔牙窝与愈合后位点的对比回顾性研究:上颌 6-7 年后的结果。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 Mar-Apr;26(2):373-84.
2
Immediate loading of tapered implants placed in postextraction sockets: retrospective analysis of the 5-year clinical outcome.即刻加载种植体在拔牙窝中的应用:5 年临床结果的回顾性分析。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012 Aug;14(4):565-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00297.x. Epub 2010 Jul 17.
3
Long-term results of immediately loaded fast bone regeneration-coated implants placed in fresh extraction sites in the upper jaw.在上颌新鲜拔牙位点植入即刻负重的快速骨再生涂层种植体的长期效果。
J Oral Implantol. 2010;36(4):251-61. doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-09-00016.
4
A retrospective comparison of 1,022 implants: immediate versus nonimmediate.1,022 例种植体的回顾性比较:即刻与非即刻。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 Mar-Apr;27(2):421-7.
5
Immediate restoration of single implants placed immediately after implant removal. A case report.种植体取出后即刻植入单颗种植体并即刻修复。病例报告。
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2010 Dec;30(6):639-45.
6
Retrospective clinical evaluation of tapered implants: 10-year follow-up of delayed and immediate placement of maxillary implants.锥形种植体的回顾性临床评估:上颌种植体延期和即刻植入的 10 年随访。
Implant Dent. 2012 Aug;21(4):350-6. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e31825feb16.
7
Preliminary data of a prospective clinical study on the Osseotite NT implant: 18-month follow-up.关于Osseotite NT种植体的前瞻性临床研究的初步数据:18个月随访。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005 May-Jun;20(3):448-54.
8
Immediate restoration of NobelActive implants placed into fresh extraction sites in the anterior maxilla.将NobelActive种植体即刻植入上颌前部新鲜拔牙位点后的即刻修复。
J Oral Implantol. 2014 Aug;40(4):455-8. doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00254.
9
Freestanding and multiunit immediate loading of the expandable implant: an up-to-40-month prospective survival study.可扩张种植体的独立式和多单位即刻负重:一项长达40个月的前瞻性生存研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2001 Feb;85(2):148-55. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2001.113355.
10
A retrospective, multicenter study on a novo wide-body implant for posterior regions.一种新型宽体植入物在后牙区的回顾性多中心研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012 Apr;14(2):281-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00253.x. Epub 2009 Dec 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Dental Implants Inserted in Fresh Extraction Sockets versus Healed Sites: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.新鲜拔牙窝植入种植体与愈合位点植入种植体的系统评价和Meta分析
Materials (Basel). 2021 Dec 20;14(24):7903. doi: 10.3390/ma14247903.
2
Immediate Nonfunctional Loading of Two Single-Maxillary Postextractive Implants: 6-Year Postloading Results of Two Case Reports.两颗单上颌拔牙后种植体的即刻非功能性负载:两例病例报告的6年负载后结果
Case Rep Dent. 2016;2016:6816907. doi: 10.1155/2016/6816907. Epub 2016 May 16.