Yalcin Nadir, Kilicarslan Kasim, Cicek Hakan, Kayaalp Cetin, Yildirim Hasan
Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Ankara - Turkey.
Hip Int. 2011 Mar-Apr;21(2):168-75. doi: 10.5301/HIP.2011.7418. Epub 2011 Apr 11.
Large bearing metal-on-metal (MOM) total hip arthroplasty (THA) may offer advantages relating to stability and range of motion in patients with Crowe Type I and II developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). The purpose of this study was to provide an analysis of the clinical and radiological results of MOM THA in this context and compare the results with a cohort of patients treated with metal-on-polyethylene (MOP) bearing surfaces. 75 hips in 65 patients were treated with cementless MOM THA using large femoral heads (36-56 mm). The mean age of the patients was 47.4 years (29 to 59) and 54 were female. A group of 47 hips (41 patients) treated with conventional THA (screwed cup-polyethylene insert-28 mm head) was used for comparison. The study group was followed up for a mean of 62.1 months (32 to 76). No difference was found between the two groups in relation to improvement in Harris hip score (HHS) (43.1 to 90.3 points in the study group, 42.6 to 89.5 points in the control group, p>0.05). Although the preoperative range of motion in all planes were similar in both groups, the large head group demonstrated greater motion in all planes postoperatively, which was significant (all p=0.001). Additionally, there was a significant difference between groups in relation to the necessity for acetabular structural graft (8% and 31.9%, respectively; p=0.001). No major complications or adverse reactions to metal debris (ARMD) were observed in the study group. The results of large head MOM THA in young and active patients with DDH are similar to conventional THA at early follow-up, but the former offers the advantages of secure acetabular fixation without screws, greater range of motion, and lower risk of dislocation.
大型金属对金属(MOM)全髋关节置换术(THA)可能在治疗Crowe I型和II型发育性髋关节发育不良(DDH)患者时,在稳定性和活动范围方面具有优势。本研究的目的是分析在这种情况下MOM THA的临床和放射学结果,并将结果与一组接受金属对聚乙烯(MOP)关节面治疗的患者进行比较。65例患者的75髋接受了使用大股骨头(36 - 56毫米)的非骨水泥MOM THA治疗。患者的平均年龄为47.4岁(29至59岁),其中54例为女性。一组47髋(41例患者)接受传统THA(带螺钉髋臼杯 - 聚乙烯内衬 - 28毫米股骨头)治疗作为对照。研究组平均随访62.1个月(32至76个月)。两组在Harris髋关节评分(HHS)改善方面无差异(研究组从43.1分提高到90.3分,对照组从42.6分提高到89.5分,p>0.05)。虽然两组术前各平面活动范围相似,但大股骨头组术后各平面活动度更大,差异有统计学意义(所有p = 0.001)。此外,两组在髋臼结构性植骨必要性方面存在显著差异(分别为8%和31.9%;p = 0.001)。研究组未观察到重大并发症或对金属碎屑的不良反应(ARMD)。在年轻且活动的DDH患者中,大股骨头MOM THA早期随访结果与传统THA相似,但前者具有无需螺钉即可牢固固定髋臼、更大活动范围和更低脱位风险的优势。