Zhou Yan, Qu Xin-cong, Fang Zu-yi, Liu Xiang, Pan Xiao-hui, Feng Feng
Department of Orthopaedics, People's Hospital of Luotian County, Luotian 438600, Hubei, China.
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2011 Mar;24(3):236-9.
To compare clinical effects between bridge wire splint fixation and traditional Bryant traction for the treatment of femoral shaft fractures in children.
From June 2006 to June 2009,38 children with femoral shaft fractures were treated with bridge wire splint fixation and Bryant traction. In bridge wire splint group, there were 15 males and 6 females, ranging in age from 8 months to 5.3 years, with an average of (2.3 +/- 0.6) years. According to fracture site classification, 5 patients were upper 1/3 femoral fractures, 9 patients were middle 1/3 femoral fractures,and 7 patients were lower 1/3 femoral fractures. In Bryant traction group,there were 10 males and 7 females, ranging in age from 10 months to 3.2 years, with an average of (2.2 +/- 0.4) years. According to fracture site classification, 4 cases were upper 1/3 femoral fractures, 10 patients were middle 1/3 femoral fractures, 3 patients were lower 1/3 femoral fractures. The clinical features, X-ray healing time,weight-bearing time and complications of the two groups were compared.
Comparison of fracture healing time: bridge wire splint group was (6.0 +/- 0.3) weeks and Bryant traction group was (6.2 +/- 0.4) weeks; the time of weight-bearing in bridge wire splint group was (6.1 +/- 1.0) weeks and in Bryant traction group was (6.4 +/- 1.2) weeks; there was no significant difference between two groups. There was a significant difference in soft tissue complication between bridge wire splint group occurred in 3 cases and 13 cases in Bryant traction group. According to the criteria of clinical efficacy,in Bryant traction group, 12 patients got an excellent result, 4 good and 1 fair; in bridge wire splint group, the data were 17, 3 and 1 respectively,and there was no significant difference between the two groups.
Both of bridge wire splint fixation and traditional Bryant traction for the treatment of femoral shaft fractures in children have good efficacy. Compared with Bryant traction,bridge wire splint fixation is simple, safe and has reliable effect.
比较桥接钢丝夹板固定与传统布赖恩特牵引治疗儿童股骨干骨折的临床效果。
2006年6月至2009年6月,38例股骨干骨折患儿分别采用桥接钢丝夹板固定和布赖恩特牵引治疗。桥接钢丝夹板固定组男15例,女6例,年龄8个月至5.3岁,平均(2.3±0.6)岁。按骨折部位分类,股骨上1/3骨折5例,股骨中1/3骨折9例,股骨下1/3骨折7例。布赖恩特牵引组男10例,女7例,年龄10个月至3.2岁,平均(2.2±0.4)岁。按骨折部位分类,股骨上1/3骨折4例,股骨中1/3骨折10例,股骨下1/3骨折3例。比较两组的临床特点、X线愈合时间、负重时间及并发症。
骨折愈合时间比较:桥接钢丝夹板固定组为(6.0±0.3)周,布赖恩特牵引组为(6.2±0.4)周;桥接钢丝夹板固定组负重时间为(6.1±1.0)周,布赖恩特牵引组为(6.4±1.2)周;两组间差异无统计学意义。软组织并发症差异有统计学意义,桥接钢丝夹板固定组发生3例,布赖恩特牵引组发生13例。按临床疗效标准,布赖恩特牵引组优12例,良4例,可1例;桥接钢丝夹板固定组分别为17例、3例和1例,两组间差异无统计学意义。
桥接钢丝夹板固定与传统布赖恩特牵引治疗儿童股骨干骨折均有良好疗效。与布赖恩特牵引相比,桥接钢丝夹板固定操作简单、安全,效果可靠。