National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research, Portland VA Medical Center, USA.
Int J Audiol. 2011 Jul;50(7):459-67. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2011.568011. Epub 2011 Apr 12.
There is interest in using cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) to evaluate hearing aid fittings and experience-related plasticity associated with amplification; however, little is known about hearing aid signal processing effects on these responses. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of clinically relevant hearing aid gain settings, and the resulting in-the-canal signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs), on the latency and amplitude of P1, N1, and P2 waves. DESIGN & SAMPLE: Evoked potentials and in-the-canal acoustic measures were recorded in nine normal-hearing adults in unaided and aided conditions. In the aided condition, a 40-dB signal was delivered to a hearing aid programmed to provide four levels of gain (0, 10, 20, and 30 dB). As a control, unaided stimulus levels were matched to aided condition outputs (i.e. 40, 50, 60, and 70 dB) for comparison purposes.
When signal levels are defined in terms of output level, aided CAEPs were surprisingly smaller and delayed relative to unaided CAEPs, probably resulting from increases to noise levels caused by the hearing aid.
These results reinforce the notion that hearing aids modify stimulus characteristics such as SNR, which in turn affects the CAEP in a way that does not reliably reflect hearing aid gain.
使用皮质听觉诱发电位(CAEPs)评估助听器适配和与放大相关的经验相关的可塑性很有意义;然而,对于这些反应与助听器信号处理之间的关系,我们知之甚少。本研究的目的是确定临床相关的助听器增益设置以及由此产生的传入通道信噪比(SNR)对 P1、N1 和 P2 波潜伏期和振幅的影响。
在 9 名听力正常的成年人中记录了诱发电位和传入通道声学测量值,这些人在未佩戴和佩戴助听器的情况下进行了测量。在佩戴助听器的情况下,向助听器提供 40dB 的信号,该助听器被编程为提供 4 个增益水平(0、10、20 和 30dB)。作为对照,为了进行比较,将未佩戴助听器的刺激水平与佩戴助听器的输出水平(即 40、50、60 和 70dB)相匹配。
当以输出水平定义信号水平时,与未佩戴助听器的 CAEPs 相比,佩戴助听器的 CAEPs 出人意料地更小且更延迟,这可能是由于助听器引起的噪声水平增加所致。
这些结果强化了助听器会改变刺激特征(如 SNR)的观点,这反过来又以一种无法可靠反映助听器增益的方式影响 CAEP。