Bueno Otávio
Department of Philosophy, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL 33124-4670, USA.
Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2011 Jun;42(2):180-9. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2010.11.025. Epub 2011 Feb 5.
As an illustration of the complexities involved in connecting physics and molecular biology at the nanoscale, in this paper I discuss two case studies from nanoscience. The first examines the use of a biological structure (DNA) to build nanostructures in a controlled way. The second discusses the attempt to build a single molecular wire, and then decide whether such a wire is indeed conducting. After presenting the central features of each case study, I examine the role played in them by microscopic imaging, the different styles of reasoning involved, and the various theoretical, methodological, and axiological differences. I conclude by arguing that, except for the probe microscopes that are used, there is very little in common between the two cases. At the nanoscale, physics and molecular biology seem to meet in a non-unified way.
作为在纳米尺度上连接物理学和分子生物学所涉及的复杂性的一个例证,在本文中我讨论来自纳米科学的两个案例研究。第一个案例研究考察了利用生物结构(DNA)以可控方式构建纳米结构。第二个案例研究讨论了构建单分子导线的尝试,然后判定这样一根导线是否真的具有导电性。在呈现每个案例研究的核心特征之后,我考察了微观成像在其中所起的作用、所涉及的不同推理方式以及各种理论、方法和价值论方面的差异。我得出结论认为,除了所使用的探针显微镜之外,这两个案例几乎没有共同之处。在纳米尺度上,物理学和分子生物学似乎以一种非统一的方式交汇。