Teufel Thomas
Department of Philosophy, VC 5-288, Baruch College, The City University of New York, One Bernard Baruch Way, New York, NY 10010, USA.
Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2011 Jun;42(2):252-60. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2010.12.002. Epub 2011 Feb 5.
A well-rehearsed move among teleological realists in the philosophy of biology is to base the idea of genuinely teleological forms of organic self-reproduction on a type of causality derived from Kant. Teleological realists have long argued for the causal possibility of this form of causality--in which a whole is considered the cause of its parts--as well as formulated a set of teleological criteria of adequacy for it. What is missing, to date, is an account of the mereological principles that govern the envisioned whole-to-part causality. When the latter principles are taken into account, we find that there is no version of whole-to-part causality that is mereologically, causally and teleologically possible all at once, as teleological realism requires.
生物学哲学中目的论实在论者常用的一个精心设计的策略是,将真正目的论形式的有机自我繁殖概念建立在一种源自康德的因果关系类型之上。长期以来,目的论实在论者一直主张这种因果关系形式(即整体被视为其部分的原因)在因果关系上的可能性,并为其制定了一套目的论的充分性标准。迄今为止,所缺少的是对支配所设想的整体到部分因果关系的分体论原则的说明。当考虑到后者的原则时,我们发现,正如目的论实在论所要求的那样,不存在一种同时在分体论、因果关系和目的论上都可能的整体到部分的因果关系版本。