van den Berg Hein
TU Dortmund, Institut für Philosophie und Politikwissenschaft, Emil-Figge-Straße 50, 4427 Dortmund, Deutschland, Raum 2.249, Germany; Vrije Universiteit, Faculteit der Wijsbegeerte, De Boelelaan 1105, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2013 Dec;44(4 Pt B):724-34. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2013.07.003. Epub 2013 Aug 8.
Kant's teleology as presented in the Critique of Judgment is commonly interpreted in relation to the late eighteenth-century biological research of Johann Friedrich Blumenbach. In the present paper, I show that this interpretative perspective is incomplete. Understanding Kant's views on teleology and biology requires a consideration of the teleological and biological views of Christian Wolff and his rationalist successors. By reconstructing the Wolffian roots of Kant's teleology, I identify several little known sources of Kant's views on biology. I argue that one of Kant's main contributions to eighteenth-century debates on biology consisted in demarcating biology from metaphysics. Kant rejected Wolffian views on the hierarchy of sciences, according to which propositions specifying the functions of organisms are derived from theological truths. In addition, Kant argued that organic self-organization necessitates a teleological description in order to show that self-organization does not support materialism. By demarcating biology and metaphysics, Kant made a small yet important contribution to establishing biology as a science.
康德在《判断力批判》中所呈现的目的论,通常是在与约翰·弗里德里希·布卢门巴赫18世纪晚期的生物学研究相关的背景下得到阐释的。在本文中,我指出这种阐释视角并不完整。理解康德关于目的论和生物学的观点,需要考量克里斯蒂安·沃尔夫及其理性主义后继者们的目的论和生物学观点。通过重构康德目的论的沃尔夫主义根源,我找出了康德关于生物学观点的几个鲜为人知的来源。我认为,康德在18世纪关于生物学的争论中所做出的主要贡献之一,在于将生物学与形而上学区分开来。康德摒弃了沃尔夫关于科学等级制度的观点,按照该观点,阐明生物体功能的命题源自神学真理。此外,康德认为有机的自我组织需要一种目的论描述,以便表明自我组织并不支持唯物主义。通过区分生物学和形而上学,康德为将生物学确立为一门科学做出了虽小却重要的贡献。