• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项由社区居住的老年人评估认知和药盒装药准确性的试点研究。

A pilot study to assess cognition and pillbox fill accuracy by community-dwelling older adults.

作者信息

Lam Annie Y, Anderson Kitty, Borson Soo, Smith Forrest L

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.

出版信息

Consult Pharm. 2011 Apr;26(4):256-63. doi: 10.4140/TCP.n.2011.256.

DOI:10.4140/TCP.n.2011.256
PMID:21486736
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess pillbox fill accuracy and cognition among community-dwelling older adults.

DESIGN

A descriptive, cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Retail pharmacy.

PARTICIPANTS

Convenience sample of English-speaking adults older than 60 years of age without dementia, taking more than four medications, and naive to Mediset use.

INTERVENTIONS

In face-to-face interviews, subjects provided demographic, medical, and medication information, completed the Mini-Cog and Medi-Cog (combination of Mini-Cog and medication-transfer screen [MTS]), and filled their own medications in a pillbox. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and stepwise regression analysis with correctly filled pill count (PC) as the dependent variable and the cognitive screens as independent variables.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Accuracy of the Mini-Cog, MTS, and Medi-Cog in predicting PC.

RESULTS

Among 50 subjects (58% female, mean age 76.4 years), only one subject failed to pass the Mini-Cog and two failed to reach the criterion level of correctly filled PC. The mean (standard deviation) Mini-Cog score for the sample was 4.38 (0.81), MTS score was 4.1 (1.31), Medi-Cog score was 8.48 (1.82), and the mean PC was 97% (8%). The Mini-Cog and MTS individually accounted for about 30% of the variance (P < 0.001); the Medi-Cog accounted for 44% of the variance (P < 0.001), indicating strongest PC prediction.

CONCLUSION

Nearly all study participants filled pillboxes accurately. The Medi-Cog was the strongest predictor of pillbox fill accuracy. Future studies of medication self-management abilities among community-dwelling older adults should include representative samples of this population, comprehensive assessment of health status, cognitive screening, pillbox fill accuracy, and the utilization of medications in filled pillboxes.

摘要

目的

评估社区居住的老年人药盒装药准确性及认知情况。

设计

描述性横断面研究。

地点

零售药店。

参与者

以60岁以上、无痴呆、服用四种以上药物且未使用过Mediset药盒的讲英语成年人为便利样本。

干预措施

在面对面访谈中,受试者提供人口统计学、医疗及用药信息,完成简易认知评估(Mini-Cog)和药物认知评估(Medi-Cog,简易认知评估与药物转移筛查[MTS]的组合),并将自己的药物装入药盒。使用描述性统计和逐步回归分析进行数据分析,以正确装药数量(PC)作为因变量,认知筛查作为自变量。

主要观察指标

Mini-Cog、MTS和Medi-Cog预测PC的准确性。

结果

在50名受试者(58%为女性,平均年龄76.4岁)中,只有1名受试者未通过Mini-Cog测试,2名未达到正确装药的标准水平。样本的Mini-Cog平均(标准差)得分为4.38(0.81),MTS得分为4.1(1.31),Medi-Cog得分为8.48(1.82),平均PC为97%(8%)。Mini-Cog和MTS各自解释了约30%的方差(P<0.001);Medi-Cog解释了44%的方差(P<0.001),表明其对PC的预测能力最强。

结论

几乎所有研究参与者都能准确装药。Medi-Cog对药盒装药准确性的预测能力最强。未来关于社区居住老年人药物自我管理能力的研究应纳入该人群的代表性样本,全面评估健康状况、认知筛查、药盒装药准确性以及装入药盒的药物使用情况。

相似文献

1
A pilot study to assess cognition and pillbox fill accuracy by community-dwelling older adults.一项由社区居住的老年人评估认知和药盒装药准确性的试点研究。
Consult Pharm. 2011 Apr;26(4):256-63. doi: 10.4140/TCP.n.2011.256.
2
Identifying patients at risk for medication mismanagement: using cognitive screens to predict a patient's accuracy in filling a pillbox.识别存在药物管理不当风险的患者:使用认知筛查来预测患者填充药盒的准确性。
Consult Pharm. 2008 Jun;23(6):459-72. doi: 10.4140/tcp.n.2008.459.
3
Cognitive and literacy screening as predictors of ability to fill a pillbox using two pillbox assessment scoring methods.使用两种药盒评估评分方法,认知和读写能力筛查作为填充药盒能力的预测指标。
Consult Pharm. 2014;29(5):304-16. doi: 10.4140/TCP.n.2014.304.
4
Can Brief Cognitive or Medication Management Tasks Identify the Potential for Dependence in Instrumental Activities of Daily Living?简短的认知或药物管理任务能否识别日常生活工具性活动中的依赖可能性?
Front Aging Neurosci. 2020 Feb 20;12:33. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2020.00033. eCollection 2020.
5
Cognitive impairment, chronic disease burden, and functional disability: a population study of older Italians.认知障碍、慢性病负担与功能残疾:一项针对意大利老年人群的研究
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2007 Aug;15(8):716-24. doi: 10.1097/JGP.0b013e3180487cd7. Epub 2007 Jun 13.
6
Impaired vision and the ability to take medications.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Jul;53(7):1179-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53376.x.
7
Assessment of older adults' knowledge of and preferences for medication management tools and support systems.评估老年人对药物管理工具和支持系统的了解及偏好。
Ann Pharmacother. 2009 Jun;43(6):1011-9. doi: 10.1345/aph.1L704. Epub 2009 May 26.
8
[Use of the Mini-Cog test as a screening method for dementia in the Italian population: the Argento Study results].[使用简易认知筛查量表(Mini-Cog)作为意大利人群痴呆症筛查方法:阿根廷研究结果]
Ig Sanita Pubbl. 2006 Mar-Apr;62(2):159-72.
9
Medication management among home-dwelling older patients with chronic diseases: possible roles for community pharmacists.慢性病居家老年患者的药物管理:社区药师的可能作用。
J Nutr Health Aging. 2012 Aug;16(8):721-6. doi: 10.1007/s12603-012-0028-x.
10
Medication safety in older adults: home-based practice patterns.老年人用药安全:居家实践模式
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Jun;53(6):976-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53308.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Tools to measure barriers to medication management capacity in older adults: a scoping review.衡量老年人药物管理能力障碍的工具:系统评价。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Mar 27;24(1):285. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-04893-7.
2
Conventional clock drawing tests have low to moderate reliability and validity for detecting subtle cognitive impairments in community-dwelling older adults.传统的画钟测试在检测社区居住的老年人细微认知障碍方面,可靠性和有效性较低至中等。
Front Aging Neurosci. 2023 Aug 29;15:1210585. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2023.1210585. eCollection 2023.
3
Guardianship: A medicolegal review for clinicians.
监护:临床医生的法医学审查。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Nov;70(11):3070-3079. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17797. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
4
How Well Does the Brief Interview for Mental Status Identify Risk for Cognition Mediated Functional Impairment in a Community Sample?简易精神状态访谈在社区样本中对认知介导的功能损害风险的识别效果如何?
Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2021 Jan 13;3(1):100102. doi: 10.1016/j.arrct.2021.100102. eCollection 2021 Mar.
5
Can Brief Cognitive or Medication Management Tasks Identify the Potential for Dependence in Instrumental Activities of Daily Living?简短的认知或药物管理任务能否识别日常生活工具性活动中的依赖可能性?
Front Aging Neurosci. 2020 Feb 20;12:33. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2020.00033. eCollection 2020.