Department of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
J Behav Med. 2012 Apr;35(2):124-38. doi: 10.1007/s10865-011-9342-8. Epub 2011 Apr 13.
As is true for many behavioral theory constructs, no consensus exists on how best to measure perceived risk; therefore, it is unclear whether different measures of disease risk perception are conceptually equivalent and whether such measures are equally appropriate for people with different objective disease risk. To investigate these issues, we used four commonly utilized risk perception items (measuring beliefs about personal risk, others' risk, disease prevalence, and mortality) to assess susceptibility to cardiovascular disease, breast cancer, and lung cancer among 454 younger (ages 18-25) and 169 middle-aged (40-64) women. We examined age- and ethnicity-related differences in participants' responses to the items. We also used structural equation modeling to test whether these items reflect a multidimensional, disease-specific latent construct of risk perception; and to test whether consistency exists in participants' disease-specific risk perceptions. Despite differences in responses to individual items, hypothesized models of perceived risk fit both age groups, suggesting that risk perception can be conceptualized in younger and middle-aged women as a multidimensional construct that is specific to disease yet reflective of global risk-related beliefs.
与许多行为理论结构一样,对于如何最好地衡量感知风险,目前尚无共识;因此,尚不清楚疾病风险感知的不同衡量标准在概念上是否等同,以及这些衡量标准是否同样适用于具有不同客观疾病风险的人群。为了研究这些问题,我们使用了四个常用的风险感知项目(衡量个人风险、他人风险、疾病流行率和死亡率的信念)来评估 454 名年轻(18-25 岁)和 169 名中年(40-64 岁)女性对心血管疾病、乳腺癌和肺癌的易感性。我们研究了参与者对这些项目的反应与年龄和种族的关系。我们还使用结构方程模型来检验这些项目是否反映了风险感知的多维、特定疾病的潜在结构;并检验参与者在特定疾病的风险感知中是否存在一致性。尽管对个别项目的反应存在差异,但感知风险的假设模型适用于两个年龄组,这表明在年轻和中年女性中,可以将风险感知概念化为多维结构,该结构特定于疾病,但反映了与全球风险相关的信念。