Suppr超能文献

临床综述:急性肾损伤中连续肾脏替代治疗的最佳剂量。

Clinical review: Optimal dose of continuous renal replacement therapy in acute kidney injury.

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care, Austin Health, 145 Studley Road, Heidelberg, Victoria 3084, Australia.

出版信息

Crit Care. 2011;15(2):207. doi: 10.1186/cc9415. Epub 2011 Mar 18.

Abstract

Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is the preferred treatment for acute kidney injury in intensive care units (ICUs) throughout much of the world. Despite the widespread use of CRRT, controversy and center-specific practice variation in the clinical application of CRRT continue. In particular, whereas two single-center studies have suggested survival benefit from delivery of higher-intensity CRRT to patients with acute kidney injury in the ICU, other studies have been inconsistent in their results. Now, however, two large multi-center randomized controlled trials - the Veterans Affairs/National Institutes of Health Acute Renal Failure Trial Network (ATN) study and the Randomized Evaluation of Normal versus Augmented Level (RENAL) Replacement Therapy Study - have provided level 1 evidence that effluent flow rates above 25 mL/kg per hour do not improve outcomes in patients in the ICU. In this review, we discuss the concept of dose of CRRT, its relationship with clinical outcomes, and what target optimal dose of CRRT should be pursued in light of the high-quality evidence now available.

摘要

连续性肾脏替代治疗(CRRT)是世界范围内重症监护病房(ICU)急性肾损伤的首选治疗方法。尽管 CRRT 得到了广泛应用,但 CRRT 的临床应用仍存在争议和中心特异性实践差异。特别是,虽然两项单中心研究表明,对 ICU 急性肾损伤患者给予更高强度的 CRRT 可带来生存获益,但其他研究的结果并不一致。然而,目前两项大型多中心随机对照试验——退伍军人事务部/美国国立卫生研究院急性肾衰竭试验网络(ATN)研究和随机评估正常与增强水平(RENAL)替代治疗研究——提供了 1 级证据,表明每小时超过 25ml/kg 的流出液速率并不能改善 ICU 患者的结局。在这篇综述中,我们讨论了 CRRT 的剂量概念,及其与临床结局的关系,并根据目前高质量的证据,探讨了应追求的最佳 CRRT 目标剂量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2575/3219403/0abbfe9bc8ac/cc9415-1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验