Micozzi A, Venditti M, Amadori S, Pulsoni A, Tirindelli C, Martino P
Dipartimento di Biopatologia Umana, Università La Sapienza, Rome, Italy.
Br J Haematol. 1990 Dec;76 Suppl 2:19-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1990.tb07930.x.
The increasing incidence of bacteraemia caused by Gram-positive bacteria in neutropenic patients prompted the authors to evaluate, in a prospective trial, the role of teicoplanin in the treatment of this infection. Over a 15-month period, 76 cases of bacteraemia (out of 265 evaluable episodes of fever) were observed at the Division of Haematology, University La Sapienza, Rome. Of the 76 cases studied, 46 (60%) were caused by Gram-positive bacteria and 28 (37%) were caused by Gram-negative bacilli. All febrile episodes were treated randomly and empirically with piperacillin plus amikacin with or without teicoplanin. Overall, 41 (54%) of the 76 cases of bacteraemia responded to the initial antibiotic regimen; with subsequent modifications the response rate rose to 96%. In the treatment of Gram-positive bacteraemia, first-line administration of teicoplanin was found to be associated with early defervescence and with a significantly higher rate of success without modification of treatment (P less than 0.01). Addition of teicoplanin as second-line therapy produced a favourable outcome in 12 (70%) out of 17 cases of bacteraemia unresponsive to the initial piperacillin + amikacin regimen. No cases of Gram-positive bacteraemia associated with septic shock or adult respiratory distress syndrome were observed in either treatment group. Only two late deaths were observed, and these occurred in patients with streptococcal septicaemia who were not receiving early teicoplanin. The above data do not endorse the use of glycopeptide antibiotics in the early treatment of fever in neutropenic patients: rather, these compounds should be reserved for proven or presumed Gram-positive infections which do not respond to initial beta-lactam/aminoglycoside treatment.
中性粒细胞减少患者中革兰氏阳性菌引起的菌血症发病率不断上升,促使作者在一项前瞻性试验中评估替考拉宁在治疗这种感染中的作用。在15个月的时间里,罗马第一大学医学院血液科观察到76例菌血症(在265例可评估的发热发作中)。在研究的76例病例中,46例(60%)由革兰氏阳性菌引起,28例(37%)由革兰氏阴性杆菌引起。所有发热发作均随机经验性地用哌拉西林加丁胺卡那霉素治疗,加或不加替考拉宁。总体而言,76例菌血症病例中有41例(54%)对初始抗生素治疗方案有反应;经后续调整,有效率升至96%。在治疗革兰氏阳性菌血症时,发现一线使用替考拉宁与早期退热有关,且在不调整治疗的情况下成功率显著更高(P小于0.01)。在17例对初始哌拉西林+丁胺卡那霉素治疗方案无反应的菌血症病例中,12例(70%)加用替考拉宁作为二线治疗取得了良好效果。两个治疗组均未观察到与感染性休克或成人呼吸窘迫综合征相关的革兰氏阳性菌血症病例。仅观察到两例晚期死亡,均发生在未早期使用替考拉宁的链球菌败血症患者中。上述数据不支持在中性粒细胞减少患者发热的早期治疗中使用糖肽类抗生素:相反,这些药物应保留用于经证实或推测为革兰氏阳性感染且对初始β-内酰胺/氨基糖苷类治疗无反应的情况。