定义不孕不育症——患病率研究的系统综述。

Defining infertility--a systematic review of prevalence studies.

机构信息

Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.

出版信息

Hum Reprod Update. 2011 Sep-Oct;17(5):575-88. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmr015. Epub 2011 Apr 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Existing definitions of infertility lack uniformity, rendering comparisons in prevalence between countries or over time problematic. The absence of an agreed definition also compromises clinical management and undermines the impact of research findings. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review of the literature to determine how infertility has been defined in prevalence studies and to come up with suggestions for a feasible and clinically relevant definition.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched for relevant population-based prevalence studies published between 1975 and 2010.

RESULTS

A total of 39 articles were included in the current review. The results highlight the heterogeneity of criteria used to define infertility and critical differences between demographic and epidemiological definitions. Demographers tend to define infertility as childlessness in a population of women of reproductive age, while the epidemiological definition is based on 'trying for' or 'time to' a pregnancy, generally in a population of women exposed to the risk of conception. There is considerable variation in terms of the duration of 'trying for pregnancy', the age of women sampled and their marital or cohabitation status. This leads to inconsistencies in determining the numerator and denominator used to calculate the prevalence of infertility.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a need for an agreed definition for infertility. We suggest a clinically relevant definition based on the duration of trying for pregnancy coupled with female age.

摘要

背景

现有的不孕定义缺乏一致性,使得各国之间或随时间推移的患病率比较变得复杂。缺乏一致的定义也会影响临床管理,并削弱研究结果的影响。本研究旨在对文献进行系统综述,以确定在患病率研究中不孕的定义,并提出可行且具有临床相关性的定义的建议。

方法

检索了 MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL 和 Cochrane 系统评价数据库中 1975 年至 2010 年期间发表的基于人群的患病率研究。

结果

目前的综述共纳入了 39 篇文章。结果强调了用于定义不孕的标准的异质性以及人口统计学和流行病学定义之间的关键差异。人口统计学家倾向于将不孕定义为育龄妇女中的无子女状态,而流行病学定义则基于“尝试”或“时间”怀孕,通常是在接触怀孕风险的妇女群体中。“尝试怀孕的时间”、抽样妇女的年龄以及她们的婚姻或同居状况存在相当大的差异。这导致在确定用于计算不孕患病率的分子和分母时存在不一致。

结论

需要对不孕定义达成一致。我们建议基于尝试怀孕时间和女性年龄的临床相关定义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索