Shell Global Solution International B.V., Rijswijk, The Netherlands.
Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2011 Oct 14;168(1-2):71-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2011.03.005. Epub 2011 Mar 24.
The aim of this paper is to provide a perspective on the effect of gas type on the permeability of foam films stabilized by different types of surfactant and to present a critical overview of the tracer gas experiments, which is the common approach to determine the trapped fraction of foam in porous media. In these experiments some part of the gas is replaced by a "tracer gas" during the steady-state stage of the experiments and trapped fraction of foam is determined by fitting the effluent data to a capacitance mass-transfer model. We present the experimental results on the measurement of the gas permeability of foam films stabilized with five surfactants (non-ionic, anionic and cationic) and different salt concentrations. The salt concentrations assure formation of either common black (CBF) or Newton black films (NBF). The experiments are performed with different single gasses. The permeability of the CBF is in general higher than that of the NBF. This behavior is explained by the higher density of the surfactant molecules in the NBF compared to that of CBF. It is also observed that the permeability coefficient, K(cm/s), of CBF and NBF for non-ionic and cationic surfactants are similar and K is insensitive to film thickness. Compared to anionic surfactants, the films made by the non-ionic surfactant have much lower permeability while the films made by the cationic surfactant have larger permeability. This conclusion is valid for all gasses. For all types of surfactant the gas permeability of foam film is largely dependent on the dissolution of gas in the surfactant solution and increases with increasing gas solubility in the bulk liquid. The measured values of K are consistent with rapid diffusion of tracer gasses through trapped gas adjacent to flowing gas in porous media, and difficulties in interpreting the results of tracer-foam experiments with conventional capacitance models. The implications of the results for foam flow in porous media and factors leading to difficulties in the modeling of trapped fraction of foam are discussed in detail. To avoid complications in the interpretation of the results, the best tracer would be one with a permeability close to the permeability of the gas in the foam. This puts a lower limit on the effective diffusion coefficient for tracer in an experiment.
本文旨在探讨气体类型对不同类型表面活性剂稳定的泡沫膜透过率的影响,并对示踪气体实验进行批判性综述,这是确定多孔介质中泡沫夹带分数的常用方法。在这些实验中,在实验的稳态阶段,部分气体被“示踪气体”取代,通过将流出物数据拟合到电容传质模型来确定泡沫的夹带分数。我们提出了使用五种表面活性剂(非离子型、阴离子型和阳离子型)和不同盐浓度稳定的泡沫膜气体透过率的实验结果。盐浓度确保形成普通黑色(CBF)或牛顿黑色薄膜(NBF)。实验采用不同的单一气体进行。CBF 的透过率一般高于 NBF。这种行为可以用 NBF 中表面活性剂分子的密度高于 CBF 来解释。还观察到,非离子型和阳离子型表面活性剂的 CBF 和 NBF 的渗透系数 K(cm/s)相似,且 K 对薄膜厚度不敏感。与阴离子型表面活性剂相比,非离子型表面活性剂形成的薄膜透过率低得多,而阳离子型表面活性剂形成的薄膜透过率大得多。这个结论对于所有气体都是有效的。对于所有类型的表面活性剂,泡沫膜的气体透过率在很大程度上取决于气体在表面活性剂溶液中的溶解,并且随着在体相液体中气体溶解度的增加而增加。测量得到的 K 值与示踪气体在多孔介质中与流动气体相邻的被捕获气体中快速扩散一致,并且与使用传统电容模型解释示踪泡沫实验结果存在困难。讨论了这些结果对多孔介质中泡沫流动的影响以及导致泡沫夹带分数建模困难的因素。为了避免解释结果的复杂化,最佳示踪剂应为与泡沫中气体渗透率接近的示踪剂。这为实验中示踪剂的有效扩散系数设定了下限。