Northeastern University, Bouvé College of Health Sciences, School of Pharmacy, 206 Mugar Building, 360 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2011 Jun;37(6):558-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2011.02.007. Epub 2011 Apr 14.
Selective pressure from glycopeptide use has led to non-susceptible strains of Staphylococcus aureus, including heterogeneously vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (hVISA). Treatment of hVISA infections with vancomycin has been associated with treatment failure, therefore new treatments are required. The objective of this study was to evaluate the activity of telavancin, vancomycin and linezolid against hVISA clinical strains. Twenty-five hVISA isolates were evaluated for minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) by microdilution and for bactericidal activity by time-kill analysis [starting inoculum ca. 10(6)colony-forming units (CFU)/mL and ca. 10(8)CFU/mL] against telavancin, vancomycin and linezolid. MICs for 50% and 90% of the organisms (MIC(50) and MIC(90) values, respectively) were, respectively, 0.5mg/L and 1mg/L for telavancin and 2mg/L and 2mg/L for both vancomycin and linezolid. In time-kill studies, telavancin was bactericidal against all strains at plasma peak and trough concentrations and at low and high inocula. At low inoculum, the time to bactericidal activity (defined as 99.9% kill from initial inoculum) (T(99.9)) for telavancin was 5.6 ± 3.2 h at peak concentration and 12.3 ± 5.2 h at trough concentration. This was superior to vancomycin (P<0.001), which had a T(99.9) of 18.8 ± 2.1 h at peak concentration and 19.1 ± 2.2 h at trough concentration. At high inoculum, telavancin had a T(99.9) of 16.3 ± 3.2 h at peak concentration and 21.4 ± 2.5 h at trough concentration, whilst vancomycin did not consistently achieve bactericidal activity. Linezolid was not bactericidal against any strain at either concentration or inoculum. In conclusion, the killing activity of telavancin against hVISA was found to be superior to vancomycin and linezolid.
糖肽类药物的选择压力导致了耐糖肽类金黄色葡萄球菌(包括异质性万古霉素中介金黄色葡萄球菌(hVISA))的出现。万古霉素治疗 hVISA 感染与治疗失败有关,因此需要新的治疗方法。本研究的目的是评估替拉万星、万古霉素和利奈唑胺对 hVISA 临床株的活性。通过微量稀释法评估了 25 株 hVISA 分离株的最小抑菌浓度(MIC),并用时间杀菌分析评估了替拉万星、万古霉素和利奈唑胺的杀菌活性[起始接种量约为 10(6)个菌落形成单位(CFU)/mL 和约 10(8)CFU/mL]。替拉万星的 MIC50 和 MIC90 值分别为 0.5mg/L 和 1mg/L,万古霉素和利奈唑胺的 MIC50 和 MIC90 值分别为 2mg/L 和 2mg/L。在时间杀菌研究中,替拉万星在血浆峰和谷浓度以及低和高接种量时对所有菌株均具有杀菌活性。在低接种量时,替拉万星在血浆峰浓度和谷浓度时达到杀菌活性(定义为初始接种量减少 99.9%)的时间(T99.9)分别为 5.6 ± 3.2 h 和 12.3 ± 5.2 h,优于万古霉素(P<0.001),万古霉素在血浆峰浓度和谷浓度时的 T99.9 分别为 18.8 ± 2.1 h 和 19.1 ± 2.2 h。在高接种量时,替拉万星在血浆峰浓度和谷浓度时的 T99.9 分别为 16.3 ± 3.2 h 和 21.4 ± 2.5 h,而万古霉素则不能始终保持杀菌活性。利奈唑胺在任何浓度或接种量下对任何菌株均无杀菌活性。总之,替拉万星对 hVISA 的杀菌活性优于万古霉素和利奈唑胺。