Suppr超能文献

使用氨氯地平、奥美沙坦酯氢氯噻嗪为基础的滴定方案治疗糖尿病患者的高血压。

Management of hypertension in patients with diabetes using an amlodipine-, olmesartan medoxomil-, and hydrochlorothiazide-based titration regimen.

机构信息

University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, Texas, USA.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2011 May 1;107(9):1346-52. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.12.045.

Abstract

The safety and efficacy of an amlodipine/olmesartan medoxomil (OM)-based titration regimen was assessed in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension. After a 2- to 3-week placebo run-in period, 207 patients received amlodipine 5 mg and were uptitrated to amlodipine/OM 5/20, 5/40, and 10/40 mg and then amlodipine/OM 10/40 mg plus hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 and 25 mg in a step-wise manner at 3-week intervals if the seated blood pressure (BP) remained ≥120/70 mm Hg. The primary end point was the change from baseline in the mean 24-hour ambulatory systolic BP after 12 weeks of treatment. The baseline mean ± SD seated cuff systolic/diastolic BP was 158.8 ± 13.1/89.1 ± 10.1 mm Hg and the mean ± SD 24-hour ambulatory systolic/diastolic BP was 144.4 ± 11.7/81.6 ± 9.8 mm Hg. At week 12, the change from baseline in the mean ± SEM 24-hour ambulatory systolic/diastolic BP was -19.9 ± 0.8/-11.2 ± 0.5 mm Hg (p<0.0001 vs baseline), and 70% of patients had achieved a 24-hour ambulatory BP target of <130/80 mm Hg. At the end of 18 weeks of active treatment in patients uptitrated to amlodipine/OM 10/40 mg plus hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg, the change from baseline in the mean ± SEM seated BP was -28.0 ± 1.5/-13.7 ± 1.0 mm Hg (p<0.0001 vs baseline), with 62% of patients reaching the guideline-recommended seated BP goal of <130/80 mm Hg. Drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 19.3% of patients. The most frequent events were peripheral edema (6%), dizziness (3%), and hypotension (2%). In conclusion, this amlodipine/OM-based titration regimen was well tolerated and effectively lowered BP throughout the 24-hour dosing interval in patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes.

摘要

评估了氨氯地平/奥美沙坦酯(OM)滴定方案在 2 型糖尿病合并高血压患者中的安全性和疗效。在 2 至 3 周的安慰剂导入期后,207 名患者接受氨氯地平 5mg,并逐步滴定至氨氯地平/OM 5/20、5/40 和 10/40mg,然后在 3 周间隔内加用氢氯噻嗪 12.5 和 25mg,如果坐位血压(BP)仍≥120/70mmHg。主要终点是治疗 12 周后 24 小时动态收缩压的基线变化。基线时坐位袖带收缩压/舒张压的平均值±标准差为 158.8±13.1/89.1±10.1mmHg,24 小时动态收缩压/舒张压的平均值±标准差为 144.4±11.7/81.6±9.8mmHg。第 12 周时,24 小时动态收缩压/舒张压的平均变化±SEM 为-19.9±0.8/-11.2±0.5mmHg(p<0.0001 与基线相比),70%的患者达到 24 小时动态血压目标<130/80mmHg。在将患者滴定至氨氯地平/OM 10/40mg 加氢氯噻嗪 25mg 的活性治疗 18 周结束时,坐位 BP 的平均变化±SEM 为-28.0±1.5/-13.7±1.0mmHg(p<0.0001 与基线相比),62%的患者达到推荐的坐位 BP 目标<130/80mmHg。药物相关的治疗中出现的不良事件发生在 19.3%的患者中。最常见的事件是外周水肿(6%)、头晕(3%)和低血压(2%)。总之,这种基于氨氯地平/OM 的滴定方案在高血压合并 2 型糖尿病患者中耐受性良好,能有效降低整个 24 小时给药间隔的血压。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验