Suppr超能文献

改良牛津分级量表和 Peritron 测压计的观察者间可靠性研究。

Inter-rater reliability study of the modified Oxford Grading Scale and the Peritron manometer.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, Department of Biomechanics, Medicine and Rehabilitation of Locomotor System, Course of Physiotherapy, University of São Paulo, Av. Bandeirantes, 3900, Monte Alegre, 14049-900, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Physiotherapy. 2011 Jun;97(2):132-8. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2010.06.007. Epub 2010 Oct 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the inter-rater reliability of the modified Oxford Grading Scale and the Peritron manometer.

DESIGN

All participants were evaluated twice, first by one examiner and 30 days later by a second examiner. Measurements of vaginal squeeze pressure were compared with the results from the palpation test.

PARTICIPANTS

Nineteen women with a mean age of 23.7 years (range 21 to 28 years).

RESULTS

Inter-rater reliability for vaginal palpation was fair (κ=0.33, 95% confidence interval 0.09 to 0.57). Using the Peritron manometer, the difference between examiners was less than 10cmH(2)O in 11 of the 19 (58%) cases. The palpation test did not differentiate between weak, moderate, good and strong muscle contractions. This study found fair inter-rater reliability for the modified Oxford Grading Scale and moderate inter-rater reliability for the Peritron manometer.

CONCLUSIONS

The inter-rater reliability of vaginal squeeze pressure measurement using the Peritron manometer is acceptable and can be used in re-evaluations performed by different examiners in clinical practice. However, for research purposes, the ideal situation would be for a single examiner to assess and re-assess the subject. Vaginal palpation is important in the clinical assessment of correctness of a pelvic floor muscle contraction, but this study does not support the use of the modified Oxford Grading Scale as a reliable and valid method to measure and differentiate pelvic floor muscle strength.

摘要

目的

评估改良牛津分级量表和 Peritron 测压器的组内信度。

设计

所有参与者均接受两次评估,第一次由一名检查者进行,30 天后由第二名检查者进行。阴道收缩压的测量值与触诊试验的结果进行比较。

参与者

19 名年龄平均为 23.7 岁(范围 21 至 28 岁)的女性。

结果

阴道触诊的组内信度为中等(κ=0.33,95%置信区间 0.09 至 0.57)。使用 Peritron 测压器,在 19 例中,有 11 例(58%)两名检查者之间的差异小于 10cmH₂O。触诊试验不能区分弱、中、强和强肌肉收缩。本研究发现改良牛津分级量表的组内信度为中等,Peritron 测压器的组内信度为中等。

结论

使用 Peritron 测压器测量阴道收缩压的组内信度可接受,可用于临床实践中由不同检查者进行的重新评估。然而,对于研究目的而言,理想的情况是由单一检查者对受试者进行评估和重新评估。阴道触诊对于评估盆底肌肉收缩的正确性很重要,但本研究不支持将改良牛津分级量表作为测量和区分盆底肌肉力量的可靠和有效的方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验