Suppr超能文献

依折麦布/辛伐他汀联合治疗与他汀类单药治疗在真实临床环境中降低低密度脂蛋白胆固醇及达标率的比较。

Combination therapy with ezetimibe/simvastatin versus statin monotherapy for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction and goal attainment in a real-world clinical setting.

机构信息

Analytic Solutions, LLC, New York, New York 10003, USA.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 2011 Feb;33(2):212-24. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2011.02.011.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Randomized studies have demonstrated improved attainment of target low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) values when ezetimibe is combined with statins for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia. However, the efficacy of an intervention in randomized controlled clinical studies may not correlate with its efficacy in a real-world (community practice) setting. Data to support the LDL-C lowering efficacy of ezetimibe/simvastatin (EZE/SMV) outside of controlled clinical studies are currently lacking.

OBJECTIVE

Using patient data from a large, national, administrative claims database, this retrospective observational study evaluated the efficacy of EZE/SMV in lowering LDL-C values and achieving LDL-C target values in newly initiating users and compared the results with those from several statin monotherapies.

METHODS

Patients with hypercholesterolemia who had filled their first prescription for EZE/SMV or statin monotherapy between July 1, 2004, and December 31, 2007, and were ≥18 years old were evaluated. Pertinent data taken from the database included lipid-lowering drug name, date of first prescription, dose, serum lipid levels, and sample dates. Data on cardiovascular history, diabetes, and other concurrent diseases and therapies were also available. Following propensity score matching, multivariate regression models were constructed to estimate the impact of the choice of therapy on key treatment outcomes including the reduction of LDL-C (absolute and percent) as well as the percent of patients achieving goal LDL-C levels as defined by the updated American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology (AHA/ACC) Guidelines for 2006.

RESULTS

In the total population, both the percent decrease and the absolute reduction in LDL-C values were significantly greater with the use of EZE/SMV than with the 3 statin monotherapies (P < 0.005 for all comparisons). A significantly greater percentage of patients achieved AHA/ACC LDL-C goals in the first 3 months of EZE/SMV treatment compared with those using each statin monotherapy (P < 0.05 for all comparisons). Among matched patients with diagnosed diabetes, the percent reduction in LDL-C was also higher with the use of EZE/SMV than with each statin monotherapy (P < 0.005 for all comparisons).

CONCLUSION

In a real-world setting, EZE/SMV appeared to be more effective than simvastatin, atorvastatin, or rosuvastatin monotherapy for attaining therapeutic goals set forth by national and professional societies in patients being initiated on statin-based lipid-lowering therapy.

摘要

背景

随机研究表明,当依折麦布与他汀类药物联合用于治疗高胆固醇血症时,可提高目标低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)值的达标率。然而,随机对照临床试验中的干预措施的疗效可能与真实世界(社区实践)环境中的疗效不相关。目前缺乏依折麦布/辛伐他汀(EZE/SMV)在控制临床试验之外降低 LDL-C 的疗效数据。

目的

本回顾性观察性研究使用来自大型全国性行政索赔数据库的患者数据,评估了依折麦布/辛伐他汀在新起始使用患者中降低 LDL-C 值和达到 LDL-C 目标值的疗效,并将结果与几种他汀类单药治疗进行了比较。

方法

评估了 2004 年 7 月 1 日至 2007 年 12 月 31 日期间首次开具依折麦布/辛伐他汀或他汀类单药处方且年龄≥18 岁的高胆固醇血症患者。从数据库中获取的相关数据包括降脂药物名称、首次处方日期、剂量、血清血脂水平和样本日期。还可获得心血管病史、糖尿病和其他并存疾病及治疗的相关数据。经倾向评分匹配后,构建多元回归模型,以评估治疗选择对关键治疗结局的影响,包括 LDL-C 的降低(绝对值和百分比)以及达到美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会(AHA/ACC)2006 年更新指南定义的 LDL-C 目标水平的患者比例。

结果

在总体人群中,与使用 3 种他汀类单药治疗相比,使用 EZE/SMV 治疗时 LDL-C 值的百分比降幅和绝对降幅均显著更大(所有比较 P<0.005)。与使用每种他汀类单药治疗相比,EZE/SMV 治疗的患者在治疗的前 3 个月内达到 AHA/ACC LDL-C 目标的比例显著更高(所有比较 P<0.05)。在诊断患有糖尿病的匹配患者中,使用 EZE/SMV 治疗时 LDL-C 的降幅也显著高于每种他汀类单药治疗(所有比较 P<0.005)。

结论

在真实世界环境中,与辛伐他汀、阿托伐他汀或罗苏伐他汀单药治疗相比,依折麦布/辛伐他汀在开始他汀类药物降脂治疗的患者中似乎更能达到国家和专业学会制定的治疗目标。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验