Suppr超能文献

肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂治疗的类风湿关节炎患者严重感染的发生率和危险因素:来自日本类风湿关节炎患者长期安全性登记处的报告。

Incidence and risk factors for serious infection in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors: a report from the Registry of Japanese Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients for Longterm Safety.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacovigilance, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, and the Clinical Research Center, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

J Rheumatol. 2011 Jul;38(7):1258-64. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.101009. Epub 2011 Apr 15.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) inhibitors to nonbiological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) for the risk of serious infection in Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

Serious infections occurring within the first year of the observation period were examined using the records for patients recruited to the Registry of Japanese Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients for Longterm Safety (REAL), a hospital-based prospective cohort of patients with RA. The analysis included 1144 patients, 646 of whom were treated with either infliximab or etanercept [exposed group: 592.4 patient-years (PY)]. The remaining 498 patients received nonbiological DMARD with no biologics (unexposed group: 454.7 PY).

RESULTS

In the unexposed group, the incidence rate for all serious adverse events (SAE) was 9.02/100 PY and for serious infections, 2.64/100 PY. In the exposed group, SAE occurred in 16.04/100 PY and serious infections in 6.42/100 PY. The crude incidence rate ratio comparing serious infections in the exposed group with the unexposed group was 2.43 (95% CI 1.27-4.65), a significant increase. A multivariate analysis revealed that the use of TNF inhibitors is a significant independent risk factor for serious infection (relative risk 2.37, 95% CI 1.11-5.05, p = 0.026).

CONCLUSION

Our study has provided the first epidemiological data on Japanese patients with RA for the safety of TNF inhibitors compared to nonbiological DMARD for up to 1 year of treatment. Anti-TNF therapy was associated with a significantly increased risk for serious infections, compared to treatment with nonbiological DMARD.

摘要

目的

比较肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)抑制剂与非生物性疾病修正抗风湿药物(DMARD)在日本类风湿关节炎(RA)患者中的严重感染风险。

方法

使用日本类风湿关节炎患者长期安全性登记(REAL)的患者记录,对观察期内第一年发生的严重感染进行检查。REAL 是一项基于医院的 RA 患者前瞻性队列研究,共纳入 1144 名患者,其中 646 名患者接受英夫利昔单抗或依那西普治疗(暴露组:592.4 人年)。其余 498 名患者接受无生物制剂的非生物性 DMARD 治疗(未暴露组:454.7 人年)。

结果

在未暴露组中,所有严重不良事件(SAE)的发生率为 9.02/100 人年,严重感染发生率为 2.64/100 人年。在暴露组中,SAE 发生率为 16.04/100 人年,严重感染发生率为 6.42/100 人年。暴露组与未暴露组比较,严重感染的粗发病率比为 2.43(95%CI 1.27-4.65),显著增加。多变量分析显示,使用 TNF 抑制剂是严重感染的显著独立危险因素(相对风险 2.37,95%CI 1.11-5.05,p = 0.026)。

结论

本研究提供了日本 RA 患者在长达 1 年的治疗期间,与非生物性 DMARD 相比,TNF 抑制剂安全性的首个流行病学数据。与非生物性 DMARD 治疗相比,抗 TNF 治疗与严重感染风险显著增加相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验