Walters Thomas R
Texan Eye, Austin, TX, USA.
Clin Ophthalmol. 2011;5:385-91. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S17054. Epub 2011 Mar 20.
The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of stromal hydration on surgical outcomes for patients who received the new hydrogel ocular bandage (ReSure™ Adherent Ocular Bandage, Ocular Therapeutix, Inc, Bedford, MA, USA) following routine cataract surgery.
This post-hoc, single-masked study was conducted with 310 patients who were scheduled to undergo unilateral clear corneal cataract surgery with phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation. Incisions were closed with stromal hydration (270 patients) or without stromal hydration (40 patients) based on physician standard of care. All patients received the hydrogel bandage at the conclusion of the procedure. Ocular assessments of stromal edema, flare, corneal staining, anterior chamber cells, best-corrected visual acuity, and intraocular pressure were made 24 hours after surgery.
Significantly more patients experienced stromal edema in the group with stromal hydration (26.3% versus 10.0%, respectively; P = 0.028). A higher percentage of patients experienced corneal staining when stromal hydration was performed (20.4% versus 2.5%; P = 0.004). The mean BCVA (best-corrected visual acuity) also was significantly different between the groups (logMAR of 0.164 with stromal hydration versus 0.095 without hydration; P = 0.007). No significant differences were observed between the study groups in terms of flare, anterior chamber cells, or intraocular pressure.
Cataract surgery without stromal hydration provided better surgical outcomes than the traditional hydration procedure when used in conjunction with a new hydrogel bandage.
本研究旨在探讨基质水合作用对常规白内障手术后接受新型水凝胶眼绷带(ReSure™ 粘附性眼绷带,美国马萨诸塞州贝德福德市眼治疗公司)的患者手术效果的影响。
这项事后单盲研究对310例计划接受超声乳化白内障吸除联合人工晶状体植入的单侧透明角膜白内障手术患者进行。根据医生的护理标准,切口采用基质水合作用闭合(270例患者)或不采用基质水合作用闭合(40例患者)。所有患者在手术结束时均接受水凝胶绷带。术后24小时对基质水肿、闪光、角膜染色、前房细胞、最佳矫正视力和眼压进行眼部评估。
基质水合作用组中经历基质水肿的患者明显更多(分别为26.3%和10.0%;P = 0.028)。进行基质水合作用时,经历角膜染色的患者比例更高(20.4%对2.5%;P = 0.004)。两组之间的平均最佳矫正视力(BCVA)也有显著差异(基质水合作用组的logMAR为0.164,无水合作用组为0.095;P = 0.007)。在闪光、前房细胞或眼压方面,研究组之间未观察到显著差异。
与新型水凝胶绷带联合使用时,不进行基质水合作用的白内障手术比传统水合作用手术提供了更好的手术效果。