• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

静脉血栓栓塞预防过程中的“倾向”

"Leaning" the process of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis.

作者信息

Biffl Walter L, Beno Matthew, Goodman Philip, Bahia Amit, Sabel Allison, Snow Karen, Steele Andrew W, Swartwood Claire, Thienelt Christiane, MacKenzie Thomas D, Mehler Philip S

机构信息

Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, USA.

出版信息

Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2011 Mar;37(3):99-109. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(11)37012-2.

DOI:10.1016/s1553-7250(11)37012-2
PMID:21500752
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lean principles have been used at Denver Health Medical Center since 2005 to streamline nonclinical processes. Despite allocation of significant resources, particularly the expense of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), to prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE), the incidence of postoperative VTE was significantly worse than national benchmarks. VTE risk factors were not consistently assessed, and the prescribing of prophylaxis varied widely. Lean was employed to standardize and implement risk assessment and evidence-based VTE prophylaxis for the institution.

METHODS

In a rapid improvement event, a multidisciplinary group formulated an evidence-based risk assessment tool and clinical practice guideline for VTE prophylaxis, with plans for hospitalwide implementation and monitoring.

RESULTS

The effects were immediate and improved steadily with feedback to clinicians. Within six months, compliance with the standard approached 100%. One year after implementation, the use of LMWH decreased more than 60% below baseline, and the use of sequential compression devices decreased by nearly 30%. With increased use of unfractionated heparin, the cost savings on VTE prophylaxis exceeded $15,000 per month, for a total of $425,000 since implementation. Moreover, the incidence of VTE decreased markedly during the same period. By reducing VTE rates, a total cost savings of $6.2 million was estimated for the past 28 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Applying Lean to the clinical management of VTE prophylaxis improved compliance with standards and saved the hospital a significant amount of money. This was achieved without compromising clinical outcomes. This experience could be replicated at other institutions.

摘要

背景

自2005年以来,丹佛健康医疗中心一直运用精益原则来简化非临床流程。尽管在预防静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)方面投入了大量资源,尤其是低分子量肝素(LMWH)的费用,但术后VTE的发生率仍显著高于全国基准。VTE风险因素未得到持续评估,预防措施的处方差异很大。于是采用精益方法为该机构规范并实施VTE风险评估和循证预防措施。

方法

在一次快速改进活动中,一个多学科团队制定了基于证据的VTE风险评估工具和临床实践指南,并计划在全院实施和监测。

结果

效果立竿见影,并随着向临床医生反馈而稳步改善。六个月内,标准的依从率接近100%。实施一年后,LMWH的使用量比基线水平下降了60%以上,序贯加压装置的使用量下降了近30%。随着普通肝素使用量的增加,VTE预防的成本节约超过每月15,000美元,自实施以来总计节约425,000美元。此外,同期VTE的发生率显著下降。通过降低VTE发生率,估计在过去28个月内总共节约成本620万美元。

结论

将精益方法应用于VTE预防的临床管理提高了标准依从率,并为医院节省了大量资金。这一成果在不影响临床结果的情况下实现。其他机构也可借鉴这一经验。

相似文献

1
"Leaning" the process of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis.静脉血栓栓塞预防过程中的“倾向”
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2011 Mar;37(3):99-109. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(11)37012-2.
2
A comparative cost-effectiveness analysis of mechanical and pharmacological VTE prophylaxis after lower limb arthroplasty in Australia.澳大利亚下肢关节置换术后机械性与药物性静脉血栓栓塞预防的成本效益比较分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 Apr 2;14(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1124-y.
3
Impact of thromboprophylaxis across the US acute care setting.美国急性护理环境中血栓预防的影响。
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 27;10(3):e0121429. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121429. eCollection 2015.
4
European guidelines on perioperative venous thromboembolism prophylaxis: Surgery in the elderly.欧洲围手术期静脉血栓栓塞症预防指南:老年手术。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2018 Feb;35(2):116-122. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000705.
5
Cost-effectiveness of dalteparin vs unfractionated heparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in critically ill patients.达肝素与未分级肝素预防危重症患者静脉血栓栓塞的成本效益比较。
JAMA. 2014 Nov 26;312(20):2135-45. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.15101.
6
Cost benefit of intermittent pneumatic compression for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in general surgery.间歇性气动压迫在普外科预防静脉血栓栓塞中的成本效益
Int Angiol. 2008 Dec;27(6):500-6.
7
Preventing venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients with cancer: improving compliance with clinical practice guidelines.预防住院癌症患者静脉血栓栓塞症:提高临床实践指南的依从性。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2012 Mar 15;69(6):469-81. doi: 10.2146/ajhp110187.
8
Cost-effectiveness analysis of doctor-pharmacist collaborative prescribing for venous thromboembolism in high risk surgical patients.高危手术患者静脉血栓栓塞症医生-药师联合处方的成本效益分析
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Oct 1;18(1):749. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3557-0.
9
Prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism in hospitalized medically ill patients.住院内科疾病患者静脉血栓栓塞的预防
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013 Jan 1;6(1):75-82. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.112.965939. Epub 2013 Jan 8.
10
Defects in Processes of Care for Pharmacologic Prophylaxis Are Common Among Neurosurgery Patients Who Develop In-Hospital Postoperative Venous Thromboembolism.神经外科术后发生医院内静脉血栓栓塞症的患者,其药物预防的护理流程缺陷很常见。
World Neurosurg. 2020 Feb;134:e664-e671. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.10.163. Epub 2019 Nov 4.

引用本文的文献

1
What Is Lean Management in Health Care? Development of an Operational Definition for a Cochrane Systematic Review.医疗保健中的精益管理是什么?为 Cochrane 系统评价制定操作性定义。
Eval Health Prof. 2019 Sep;42(3):366-390. doi: 10.1177/0163278718756992. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
2
Guidelines for overcoming hospital managerial challenges: a systematic literature review.克服医院管理挑战的指南:一项系统的文献综述
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2013;9:427-41. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S54178. Epub 2013 Oct 31.
3
Future developments in health care performance management.
医疗保健绩效管理的未来发展。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2013 Nov 13;6:415-21. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S54561. eCollection 2013.
4
A structured approach to improving patient safety: Lessons from a public safety-net system.一种改善患者安全的结构化方法:来自公共安全网系统的经验教训。
Patient Saf Surg. 2011 Dec 1;5(1):32. doi: 10.1186/1754-9493-5-32.