Suppr超能文献

简单规则如何决定行人行为和人群灾难。

How simple rules determine pedestrian behavior and crowd disasters.

机构信息

Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale, Unité Mixte de Recherche 5169, Université Paul Sabatier, 31062 Toulouse Cedex 9, France.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Apr 26;108(17):6884-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1016507108. Epub 2011 Apr 18.

Abstract

With the increasing size and frequency of mass events, the study of crowd disasters and the simulation of pedestrian flows have become important research areas. However, even successful modeling approaches such as those inspired by Newtonian force models are still not fully consistent with empirical observations and are sometimes hard to calibrate. Here, a cognitive science approach is proposed, which is based on behavioral heuristics. We suggest that, guided by visual information, namely the distance of obstructions in candidate lines of sight, pedestrians apply two simple cognitive procedures to adapt their walking speeds and directions. Although simpler than previous approaches, this model predicts individual trajectories and collective patterns of motion in good quantitative agreement with a large variety of empirical and experimental data. This model predicts the emergence of self-organization phenomena, such as the spontaneous formation of unidirectional lanes or stop-and-go waves. Moreover, the combination of pedestrian heuristics with body collisions generates crowd turbulence at extreme densities--a phenomenon that has been observed during recent crowd disasters. By proposing an integrated treatment of simultaneous interactions between multiple individuals, our approach overcomes limitations of current physics-inspired pair interaction models. Understanding crowd dynamics through cognitive heuristics is therefore not only crucial for a better preparation of safe mass events. It also clears the way for a more realistic modeling of collective social behaviors, in particular of human crowds and biological swarms. Furthermore, our behavioral heuristics may serve to improve the navigation of autonomous robots.

摘要

随着大型活动的规模和频率不断增加,对人群灾难的研究和行人流动的模拟已成为重要的研究领域。然而,即使是受牛顿力学模型启发的成功建模方法,也仍然不完全符合经验观察,有时也难以校准。在这里,提出了一种基于行为启发式的认知科学方法。我们认为,受视觉信息(即候选视线中障碍物的距离)的指导,行人可以应用两种简单的认知程序来调整他们的行走速度和方向。尽管比以前的方法简单,但该模型可以很好地预测个体轨迹和集体运动模式,与大量经验和实验数据具有很好的定量一致性。该模型预测了自组织现象的出现,例如单向车道或停停走走波的自发形成。此外,行人启发式与身体碰撞的结合在极端密度下产生人群湍流——这种现象在最近的人群灾难中已经观察到。通过提出一种对多个个体之间的同时相互作用进行综合处理的方法,我们的方法克服了当前基于物理启发的对相互作用模型的局限性。因此,通过认知启发式理解人群动态不仅对安全大型活动的更好准备至关重要。它还为更真实地建模集体社会行为,特别是人类人群和生物群体铺平了道路。此外,我们的行为启发式可能有助于改进自主机器人的导航。

相似文献

1
How simple rules determine pedestrian behavior and crowd disasters.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Apr 26;108(17):6884-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1016507108. Epub 2011 Apr 18.
2
Traffic instabilities in self-organized pedestrian crowds.
PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8(3):e1002442. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002442. Epub 2012 Mar 22.
3
How cognitive heuristics can explain social interactions in spatial movement.
J R Soc Interface. 2016 Aug;13(121). doi: 10.1098/rsif.2016.0439.
4
Experimental study of the behavioural mechanisms underlying self-organization in human crowds.
Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Aug 7;276(1668):2755-62. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.0405. Epub 2009 May 13.
5
Local interactions underlying collective motion in human crowds.
Proc Biol Sci. 2018 May 16;285(1878). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2018.0611.
6
Dynamics of crowd disasters: an empirical study.
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2007 Apr;75(4 Pt 2):046109. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.75.046109. Epub 2007 Apr 18.
7
Modeling crowd dynamics through coarse-grained data analysis.
Math Biosci Eng. 2018 Dec 1;15(6):1271-1290. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2018059.
8
Continuum modeling of crowd turbulence.
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2014 Oct;90(4):042816. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.90.042816. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
9
Empirical investigation on safety constraints of merging pedestrian crowd through macroscopic and microscopic analysis.
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Oct;95(Pt B):405-416. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.10.009. Epub 2015 Oct 27.
10
Robust spatial self-organization in crowds of asynchronous pedestrians.
J R Soc Interface. 2024 May;21(214):20240112. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2024.0112. Epub 2024 May 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Noise-Induced Collective Memory in Schooling Fish.
ArXiv. 2025 Jul 21:arXiv:2507.16102v1.
2
Unraveling human crowd dynamics through the foot tracking of pedestrians.
Sci Adv. 2025 Jun 27;11(26):eadw2688. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adw2688. Epub 2025 Jun 25.
3
Social and spatial predictors of collective search behaviors.
Sci Rep. 2025 May 30;15(1):19086. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-02460-7.
4
Collective decision making by embodied neural agents.
PNAS Nexus. 2025 Mar 25;4(4):pgaf101. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf101. eCollection 2025 Apr.
5
Emergence of collective oscillations in massive human crowds.
Nature. 2025 Feb;638(8049):112-119. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-08514-6. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
7
Adapting lateral stepping control to walk on winding paths.
J Biomech. 2025 Feb;180:112495. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112495. Epub 2025 Jan 7.
8
Parallel development of social behavior in biological and artificial fish.
Nat Commun. 2024 Dec 5;15(1):10613. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-52307-4.
9
A literature review of contacting force measurement methods for pedestrian crowds.
Heliyon. 2024 Oct 23;10(21):e39755. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39755. eCollection 2024 Nov 15.
10
Probability of lateral instability while walking on winding paths.
J Biomech. 2024 Nov;176:112361. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112361. Epub 2024 Oct 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Why Heuristics Work.
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2008 Jan;3(1):20-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00058.x.
2
Ant traffic rules.
J Exp Biol. 2010 Jul 15;213(Pt 14):2357-63. doi: 10.1242/jeb.031237.
3
Scale-free correlations in starling flocks.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jun 29;107(26):11865-70. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1005766107. Epub 2010 Jun 14.
4
Constant-net-time headway as a key mechanism behind pedestrian flow dynamics.
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2009 Aug;80(2 Pt 2):026120. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.80.026120. Epub 2009 Aug 20.
5
Experimental study of the behavioural mechanisms underlying self-organization in human crowds.
Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Aug 7;276(1668):2755-62. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.0405. Epub 2009 May 13.
6
Collective cognition in animal groups.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2009 Jan;13(1):36-43. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.10.002. Epub 2008 Dec 6.
7
Interaction ruling animal collective behavior depends on topological rather than metric distance: evidence from a field study.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Jan 29;105(4):1232-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0711437105. Epub 2008 Jan 28.
8
Modeling crowd turbulence by many-particle simulations.
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2007 Oct;76(4 Pt 2):046105. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.76.046105. Epub 2007 Oct 10.
9
Novelty and collective attention.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Nov 6;104(45):17599-601. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0704916104. Epub 2007 Oct 25.
10
Dynamics of crowd disasters: an empirical study.
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2007 Apr;75(4 Pt 2):046109. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.75.046109. Epub 2007 Apr 18.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验