Grandi A M, Barzizza F, Sessa F, Scalise F, Soldà P L, Venco A, Finardi G
Dipartimento di Medicina Interna e Terapia Medica, Università degli Studi, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia.
Cardiologia. 1990 Jun;35(6):465-70.
Using digitized M-mode echograms we evaluated the role of preload, afterload, inotropic state and left ventricular (LV) mass on LV systolic and diastolic function in 2 groups of hypertensive patients: Group 1: 25 subjects (18 men, mean age 48 +/- 6 years) with normal LV mass (less than 230 g); Group 2: 25 subjects (20 men, mean age 50 +/- 8 years) with LV hypertrophy (wall hypertrophy with normal LV diameter). As control group, we evaluated 50 normal subjects, matched for age, sex and body surface area with hypertensives. LV mass was significantly (p less than 0.001) higher as respect to normals also in hypertensives with normal LV mass; indexes of LV systolic and diastolic function were similar in normals and in hypertensives with normal LV mass and significantly lower in subjects with LV hypertrophy. The end-systolic wall stress was not significantly different in the 2 groups of hypertensives. We evaluated the relative role of preload (end-diastolic LV diameter), afterload (end-systolic wall stress) inotropic state (systolic arterial pressure/end-systolic LV diameter) and LV mass on LV systolic and diastolic function using multiple regression analysis. As regards LV systolic function, the major determinant was the systolic pressure/end-systolic diameter ratio in normals, the end-systolic stress in hypertensives. As regards LV diastolic function, the major determinant was end-systolic stress in normals and hypertensives with normal LV mass, LV mass in hypertensives with myocardial hypertrophy. Preload seems not to influence LV function in normals and in hypertensives with normal LV diastolic diameter. The major determinant of LV systolic function is the inotropic state in normals and the afterload in hypertensives.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
我们使用数字化M型超声心动图评估了两组高血压患者的前负荷、后负荷、心肌收缩状态及左心室(LV)质量对左心室收缩和舒张功能的作用:第1组:25名受试者(18名男性,平均年龄48±6岁),左心室质量正常(小于230克);第2组:25名受试者(20名男性,平均年龄50±8岁),有左心室肥厚(室壁肥厚,左心室直径正常)。作为对照组,我们评估了50名年龄、性别和体表面积与高血压患者相匹配的正常受试者。左心室质量正常的高血压患者的左心室质量也显著高于正常人(p<0.001);左心室收缩和舒张功能指标在正常人和左心室质量正常的高血压患者中相似,而在左心室肥厚的受试者中显著较低。两组高血压患者的收缩末期壁应力无显著差异。我们使用多元回归分析评估了前负荷(舒张末期左心室直径)、后负荷(收缩末期壁应力)、心肌收缩状态(收缩期动脉压/收缩末期左心室直径)和左心室质量对左心室收缩和舒张功能的相对作用。关于左心室收缩功能,主要决定因素在正常人中是收缩压/收缩末期直径比值,在高血压患者中是收缩末期应力。关于左心室舒张功能,主要决定因素在正常人和左心室质量正常的高血压患者中是收缩末期应力,在心肌肥厚的高血压患者中是左心室质量。前负荷似乎不影响正常人和舒张末期左心室直径正常的高血压患者的左心室功能。左心室收缩功能在正常人中的主要决定因素是心肌收缩状态,在高血压患者中是后负荷。(摘要截选至250字)