Suppr超能文献

Bricker回肠膀胱术后输尿管回肠吻合口狭窄:50例病例评估从纵切口改为“盾形”回肠切开术的影响

Ureteroileal anastomotic strictures after a Bricker ileal conduit: 50 case assessment of the impact of conversion from a slit incision to a "shield shaped" ileotomy.

作者信息

Cheng Marina, Looney Stephen W, Brown James A

机构信息

Division of Urology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, Georgia, USA.

出版信息

Can J Urol. 2011 Apr;18(2):5644-9.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Ureteroileal anastomotic stricture is a late complication of Bricker ileal conduits. We report our utilization of a "shield shaped" rather than a standard slit ileotomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed a single surgeon's experience performing Bricker ileal conduits, initially using a slit incision, then a shield shaped ileotomy. Patient demographics, type of ileotomy, indication, history of prior radiation or chemotherapy, development of postoperative ureteroileal anastomotic stricture, date of stricture diagnosis, imaging modality, stricture treatment, outcome, and length of follow up were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 50 ileal conduit patients were identified between 2001-2009. A traditional slit incision ileotomy was performed in 25 patients (Group 1) and a shield shaped ileotomy was performed in the following 25 (Group 2). After excluding 1 patient in each group that died within 90 days postoperatively, a total of 95 renal units were anastomosed, (Group 1: 24 patients, 48 renal units, 2001-2005; and Group 2: 24 patients, 47 renal units, 2006-2009). A total of 8 (8.3%) ureteroileal anastomotic strictures were identified: 6 (12.5%) in Group 1, including 1 with bilateral strictures, and 2 (4.3%) in Group 2. Stricture diagnosis occurred at 1, 4, 4, 5, 14 and 42 months in Group 1, and at 6 and 10 months in Group 2. Mean follow up was 24.2 (2-85) months and 12.3 (2-26) months for each cohort, respectively. No increase in postoperative anastomotic leakage was identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Modifying the standard ileotomy slit to a shield shaped incision does not eliminate postoperative anastomotic strictures. This technique provides greater visualization of the suture line, making it technically easier to perform.

摘要

目的

输尿管回肠吻合口狭窄是Bricker回肠膀胱术的晚期并发症。我们报告了我们采用“盾形”而非标准的纵行回肠切开术的情况。

材料与方法

我们回顾性分析了一位外科医生施行Bricker回肠膀胱术的经验,最初采用纵行切口,之后采用盾形回肠切开术。记录患者的人口统计学资料、回肠切开术类型、适应证、既往放疗或化疗史、术后输尿管回肠吻合口狭窄的发生情况、狭窄诊断日期、影像学检查方法、狭窄治疗情况、结果及随访时间。

结果

2001年至2009年间共确定了50例回肠膀胱患者。25例患者(第1组)采用传统的纵行切口回肠切开术,随后的25例(第2组)采用盾形回肠切开术。在排除每组中术后90天内死亡的1例患者后,共吻合了95个肾单位(第1组:24例患者,48个肾单位,2001 - 2005年;第2组:24例患者,47个肾单位,2006 - 2009年)。共发现8例(8.3%)输尿管回肠吻合口狭窄:第1组6例(12.5%),其中1例为双侧狭窄,第2组2例(4.3%)。第1组狭窄诊断分别发生在术后1、4、4、5、14和42个月,第2组发生在术后6和10个月。每组的平均随访时间分别为24.2(2 - 85)个月和12.3(2 - 26)个月。未发现术后吻合口漏增加。

结论

将标准的纵行回肠切开术改为盾形切口并不能消除术后吻合口狭窄。该技术能更好地显露缝合线,使其在技术上更易于操作。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验