Ohio University, Athens, OH, USA.
Ann Behav Med. 2011 Aug;42(1):1-13. doi: 10.1007/s12160-011-9269-x.
The importance of peer review in the furthering of science cannot be overstated. However, most doctoral students and early career professionals receive little formal or informal training in conducting peer reviews.
In recognition of this deficit in peer reviewer training, the present article was developed to provide an overview of the peer-review process at Annals of Behavioral Medicine and describe the general and specific elements that should be included in a high-quality review for the journal.
We conclude by offering exemplar reviews of a manuscript that was ultimately accepted for publication in the journal and provide commentary on specific aspects of these reviews.
同行评审对于推动科学发展的重要性怎么强调都不为过。然而,大多数博士生和初级专业人员在进行同行评审方面几乎没有接受过正式或非正式的培训。
鉴于同行评审培训方面的这一不足,本文旨在概述《行为医学年鉴》的同行评审过程,并描述期刊高质量评审中应包含的一般和具体要素。
我们以对一篇最终被该期刊接受发表的手稿的范例评审结束,并对这些评审的具体方面进行了评论。